Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis.

License
http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html

Type
Article

Authors
Siegert, Michael
Yates, Matthew D
Call, Douglas F
Zhu, Xiuping
Spormann, Alfred
Logan, Bruce E

KAUST Grant Number
KUS-I1-003-13

Online Publication Date
2014-02-26

Print Publication Date
2014-04-07

Date
2014-02-26

Abstract
In methanogenic microbial electrolysis cells (MMCs), CO2 is reduced to methane using a methanogenic biofilm on the cathode by either direct electron transfer or evolved hydrogen. To optimize methane generation, we examined several cathode materials: plain graphite blocks, graphite blocks coated with carbon black or carbon black containing metals (platinum, stainless steel or nickel) or insoluble minerals (ferrihydrite, magnetite, iron sulfide, or molybdenum disulfide), and carbon fiber brushes. Assuming a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen (abiotic):methane (biotic) of 4:1, methane production with platinum could be explained solely by hydrogen production. For most other materials, however, abiotic hydrogen production rates were insufficient to explain methane production. At -600 mV, platinum on carbon black had the highest abiotic hydrogen gas formation rate (1600 ± 200 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the highest biotic methane production rate (250 ± 90 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). At -550 mV, plain graphite (76 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) performed similarly to platinum (73 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). Coulombic recoveries, based on the measured current and evolved gas, were initially greater than 100% for all materials except platinum, suggesting that cathodic corrosion also contributed to electromethanogenic gas production.

Citation
Siegert M, Yates MD, Call DF, Zhu X, Spormann A, et al. (2014) Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2: 910–917. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sc400520x.

Acknowledgements
We are indebted to John Cantolina of the Materials Science Center at Penn State University for help with ESEM and Hiroyuki Kashima and Yongtae Alm for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Global Climate and Energy Program (GCEP) and by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST, award KUS-I1-003-13).

Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)

Journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

DOI
10.1021/sc400520x

PubMed ID
24741468

PubMed Central ID
PMC3982937

Permanent link to this record