Effects of Common Osmolytes on Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Surface Forces
Name:
Nischal_Maharjan_MS_Thesis_v3.pdf
Size:
22.82Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
MS Thesis
Embargo End Date:
2023-11-17
Type
ThesisAuthors
Maharjan, Nischal
Advisors
Mishra, Himanshu
Committee members
Nunes, Suzana Pereira
Fatayer, Shadi P.

KAUST Department
Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) DivisionDate
2022-11Embargo End Date
2023-11-17Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/685832
Metadata
Show full item recordAccess Restrictions
At the time of archiving, the student author of this thesis opted to temporarily restrict access to it. The full text of this thesis will become available to the public after the expiration of the embargo on 2023-11-17.Abstract
Surface forces due to electrostatics and hydrophobic interactions in aquatic media are implicated in numerous phenomena in natural and applied contexts, such as protein folding, ATP synthesis, flocculation, froth flotation, food and beverage industry, and separation and purification processes. Although the effects of hard ions like K+ and Cl- on such surface forces have been extensively studied and well understood, the effects of common osmolytes such as urea, TMAO, betaine, sarcosine, and glycine on electrostatics and the hydrophobic interaction are not entirely clear. In the recent years, direct surface force measurements are being utilized to probe these effects. The expectation is that these findings will bring us one step closer to understanding the balance of surface and molecular forces in extremophiles, e.g., Escherichia coli, Sepia officinalis, and Dasyatis americana. In this thesis, we have utilized Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and complimentary techniques to directly quantify the effects of common osmolytes on (i) electrostatic interactions between the charged silica surfaces; and (ii) hydrophobic interactions between perfluorinated surfaces. Urea, TMAO, betaine, sarcosine, and glycine enhanced the magnitude of electrostatic interaction. We provide some clues towards mechanistic insight. For hydrophobic surfaces, urea increased adhesion when perfluorinated surfaces were brought into contact, whereas TMAO, betaine, and sarcosine reduced it in the following order: TMAO > betaine > sarcosine. Advancing/receding contact angles were measured to check whether the osmolytes adsorbed onto the hydrophobic surfaces. Contact angle hysteresis data revealed that the adsorption was not significant, and these findings were corroborated via Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation experiments. Taken together, our findings advance the current understanding of osmolytes’ effects on electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions.Citation
Maharjan, N. (2022). Effects of Common Osmolytes on Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Surface Forces [KAUST Research Repository]. https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-3Z9B0ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.25781/KAUST-3Z9B0