Contrasting turbulence in stably stratified flows and thermal convection
| dc.contributor.author | Verma, Mahendra K. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-06T08:52:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-06T08:52:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Verma, M. K. (2019). Contrasting turbulence in stably stratified flows and thermal convection. Physica Scripta, 94(6), 064003. doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ab022a | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1402-4896 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8949 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/1402-4896/ab022a | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10754/678672 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The properties of stably stratified turbulence and turbulent thermal convection are contrasted in this paper. A key difference between theses flows is the sign of the kinetic energy feed by buoyancy, FB. For SST, FB < 0 due to its stable nature; consequently, the kinetic energy flux Πu (k) decreases with wavenumber k that leads to a steep kinetic energy spectrum, Eu (k) ∼k?11/5. Turbulent convection is unstable, hence FB > 0 that leads to an increase of ?u(k) with k; this increase however, is marginal due to relatively weak buoyancy, hence Eu (k) ∼k?5/3, similar to that in hydrodynamic turbulence. This paper also describes the conserved fluxes for the above systems. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This paper is an expanded version (with some new topics) of the talk given at the conference Turbulence Mixing and Beyond 2017 organized at ICTP Trieste. I thank Snezhana Abarzhi and ICTP for hosting this interesting meeting. The numerical simulations presented in the paper were performed by Abhishek Kumar, to whom I am grateful. I am also thankful to K R Sreenivasan, Jorg Schumacher, Jayant Bhattacharjee, Joe Niemela, L Skrbek, Abhishek Kumar, Ambrish Pandey, Anirban Guha, Shadab Alam, Shashwat Bhattacharya, and other members of our turbulence group for useful discussions and idea exchanges. The simulations were performed on Shaheen II of the Supercomputing Laboratory at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under the project K1052, on Chaos supercomputer of Simulation and Modeling Laboratory (SML), IIT Kanpur, and on HPC2013 of IIT Kanpur. This work was supported by the research grant PLANEX/PHY/2015239 from Indian Space Research Organisation, India. | |
| dc.publisher | IOP PUBLISHING LTD | |
| dc.relation.url | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1402-4896/ab022a | |
| dc.subject | turbulence and mixing | |
| dc.subject | turbulence modelling | |
| dc.subject | turbulent thermal convection | |
| dc.subject | stably stratified turbulence | |
| dc.title | Contrasting turbulence in stably stratified flows and thermal convection | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.journal | PHYSICA SCRIPTA | |
| dc.identifier.wosut | WOS:000464396100003 | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Phys, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 94 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
| dc.identifier.pages | 064003 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85067191127 | |
| kaust.acknowledged.supportUnit | Shaheen II of the Supercomputing Laboratory |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Statistics of scalar flux transport of major species in different premixed turbulent combustion regimes for turbulent H2-air flames(Begell House, 2018) [Conference Paper]The statistical behaviour of turbulent scalar flux (TSF) and modelling of its transport have been analysed for major species (H2,O2 and H2O) in the context of Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes simulations using a detailed chemistry Direct Numerical Simulation database of freely-propagating H2−air flames spanning the corrugated flamelets (CF), thin reaction zones (TRZ) and broken reaction zones (BRZ) regimes of premixed turbulent combustion. The TSF in the CF and TRZ regimes exhibits counter-gradient transport, whilst gradient transport was found in the BRZ regime. The TSF transport equation terms' exhibited similar behaviour in the CF and TRZ regimes, but significantly differed in the BRZ regime. Similar behaviour for different terms in the TSF equation has been observed for the major reactants, while the major product shows an opposite sign. Based on a priori assessment of existing models it has been found that they perform reasonably well in the CF and TRZ regimes, but are inadequate for the BRZ regime.
-
Surface morphology and inner fractal cutoff scale of spherical turbulent premixed flames in decaying isotropic turbulence(Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Elsevier BV, 2020-09-03) [Article]The surface of turbulent premixed flames is fractal within a finite range of scales and the fractal dimension and inner cutoff scale are key components of fractal turbulent combustion closures. In such closures, the estimate for the surface area is sensitive to the value of the inner fractal cutoff scale, whose modeling remains unclear and for which both experimental and numerical contradictory evidence exists. In this work, we analyze data from six direct numerical simulations of spherically expanding turbulent premixed flames at varying Reynolds and Karlovitz numbers. The flames propagate in decaying isotropic turbulence and fall in the flamelet regime. Past an initial transient, we find that the fractal dimension reaches an asymptotic value between 2.3 and 2.4 in good agreement with previous results at similar conditions. A minor dependence of the fractal dimension on the Reynolds and Karlovitz numbers is observed and explained by the relatively low values of the Reynolds number and narrow inertial and fractal ranges. The inner fractal cutoff scale Δ* is found to scale as where l is the integral scale of turbulence and Reλ is the Reynolds number based on the Taylor micro-scale computed in the turbulence on the reactants’ side. The scaling is robust and insensitive to the Karlovitz number over the range of values considered in this study. An important implication is that the ratio Δ*/η grows with Reynolds number (η is the Kolmogorov scale), albeit at a rather slow rate that may explain the widespread observation that 4 ≤ Δ*/η ≤ 10. This suggests that Δ*, although smaller than λ, is not a dissipative length scale for the flame surface and scaled solely by η. Finally, a dissipative threshold scale that remains constant once normalized by η is identified.
-
Evolution and scaling of the peak flame surface density in spherical turbulent premixed flames subjected to decaying isotropic turbulence(Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Elsevier BV, 2020-07-25) [Article]The peak flame surface density within the turbulent flame brush is central to turbulent premixed combustion models in the flamelet regime. This work investigates the evolution of the peak surface density in spherically expanding turbulent premixed flames with the help of direct numerical simulations at various values of the Reynolds and Karlovitz number. The flames propagate in decaying isotropic turbulence inside a closed vessel. The effects of turbulent transport, transport due to mean velocity gradient, and flame stretch on the peak surface density are identified and characterized with an analysis based on the transport equation for the flame surface density function. The three mechanisms are governed by distinct flow time scales; turbulent transport by the eddy turnover time, mean transport by a time scale related to the pressure rise in the closed chamber, and flame stretch by the Kolmogorov time scale. Appropriate scaling of the terms is proposed and shown to collapse the data despite variations in the dimensionless groups. Overall, the transport terms lead to a reduction in the peak value of the surface density, while flame stretch has the opposite effect. In the present configuration, a small imbalance between the two leads to an exponential decay of the peak surface density in time. The dimensionless decay rate is found to be consistent with the evolution of the wrinkling scale as defined in the Bray-Moss-Libby model.