• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of KAUSTCommunitiesIssue DateSubmit DateThis CollectionIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    Login

    Quick Links

    Open Access PolicyORCID LibguideTheses and Dissertations LibguideSubmit an Item

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Blue carbon as a natural climate solution

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Nature_Reviews_Macreadie_et_al_Manuscript_revised_08June2021_removed.pdf
    Size:
    310.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    43017_2021_224_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
    Size:
    803.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Supplementary material
    Download
    Type
    Article
    Authors
    Macreadie, Peter I cc
    Costa, Micheli D.P. cc
    Atwood, Trisha B. cc
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Kelleway, Jeffrey J.
    Kennedy, Hilary
    Lovelock, Catherine E cc
    Serrano, Oscar cc
    Duarte, Carlos M. cc
    KAUST Department
    Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division
    Marine Science Program
    Red Sea Research Center (RSRC)
    Date
    2021-11-01
    Embargo End Date
    2022-05-01
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/10754/673304
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs), including mangrove forests, seagrass meadows and tidal marshes, store carbon and provide co-benefits such as coastal protection and fisheries enhancement. Blue carbon sequestration has therefore been suggested as a natural climate solution. In this Review, we examine the potential for BCEs to act as carbon sinks and the opportunities to protect or restore ecosystems for this function. Globally, BCEs are calculated to store >30,000 Tg C across ~185 million ha, with their conservation potentially avoiding emissions of 304 (141–466) Tg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year. Potential BCE restoration has been estimated in the range of 0.2–3.2 million ha for tidal marshes, 8.3–25.4 million ha for seagrasses and 9–13 million ha for mangroves, which could draw down an additional 841 (621–1,064) Tg CO2e per year by 2030, collectively amounting to ~3% of global emissions (based on 2019 and 2020 global annual fossil fuel emissions). Mangrove protection and/or restoration could provide the greatest carbon-related benefits, but better understanding of other BCEs is needed. BCE destruction is unlikely to stop fully, and not all losses can be restored. However, engineering and planning for coastal protection offer opportunities for protection and restoration, especially through valuing co-benefits. BCE prioritization is potentially a cost-effective and scalable natural climate solution, but there are still barriers to overcome before blue carbon project adoption will become widespread.
    Citation
    Macreadie, P. I., Costa, M. D. P., Atwood, T. B., Friess, D. A., Kelleway, J. J., Kennedy, H., … Duarte, C. M. (2021). Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
    Sponsors
    The authors acknowledge funding by Deakin University (to P.I.M. and M.D.P.C.), Qantas (to P.I.M. and M.D.P.C.), HSBC (to P.I.M. and M.D.P.C.), Australian Research Council Discovery Grants (DP200100575; to P.I.M. and C.M.D.), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology under KAUST’s Circular Carbon Economy Initiative (to C.M.D.) and the Early Career Research Fellowship from the Gulf Research Program of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (to T.B.A.; the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Gulf Research Program of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). They also thank N. Yilmaz who helped with creation of the figures.
    Publisher
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Journal
    Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
    DOI
    10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
    Additional Links
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-021-00224-1
    https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/40499731/Nature_Reviews_Macreadie_et_al_Manuscript_revised_08June2021.pdf
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Articles; Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division; Red Sea Research Center (RSRC); Marine Science Program

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | KAUST University Library
    Open Repository is a service hosted by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items. For anonymous users the allowed maximum amount is 50 search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.