Evaluation of different cleaning strategies for different types of forward osmosis membrane fouling and scaling
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Youngjin | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Sheng | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghaffour, NorEddine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-13T10:44:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-13T10:44:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-12-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kim, Y., Li, S., & Ghaffour, N. (2020). Evaluation of different cleaning strategies for different types of forward osmosis membrane fouling and scaling. Journal of Membrane Science, 596, 117731. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117731 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117731 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10754/660995 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, various cleaning methods are investigated to effectively control membrane fouling (i.e., organic fouling, colloidal fouling and scaling) in forward osmosis (FO). Simple physical cleanings (i.e., hydraulic flushing and osmotic backwashing) are firstly employed to remove membrane fouling. Both methods achieved higher than 95% efficiency and osmotic backwashing has a better efficiency for organic fouling and scaling in long-term operation, but colloidal fouling was not removed. To enhance the efficiency, intense physical cleanings (i.e., air scouring and the combination of various physical cleaning) and chemical cleanings (i.e., EDTA, low pH and high pH) were conducted but could not remove the fouling layer possibly because of the polymerization of silica colloids. Lastly, four hybrid mitigation methods (i.e., low pH DS, pulsed flow, high crossflow, and periodic sparging of CO2 saturated solution) followed by hydraulic flushing were examined. The combination of CO2 saturated solution and hydraulic flushing completely removed the fouling layer because CO2 bubbles weakened the interaction between the fouling layer and the membrane surface. Periodic air scouring also exhibited similar effect on the fouling layer. Therefore, periodic air scouring can be more feasible option to control the silica colloidal fouling but not organic fouling. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | The research reported in this paper was supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia, through Competitive Research Grant Program - CRG2017 (CRG6), Project # UFR/1/3404-01. Authors extend their gratitude to the Water Desalination and Reuse Center (WDRC) staff for their continuous support. | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.relation.url | https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738819327425 | |
dc.rights | NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Membrane Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Membrane Science, [[Volume], [Issue], (2019-12-10)] DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117731 . © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Evaluation of different cleaning strategies for different types of forward osmosis membrane fouling and scaling | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC) | |
dc.contributor.department | Environmental Science and Engineering Program | |
dc.contributor.department | Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Membrane Science | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2021-12-10 | |
dc.eprint.version | Post-print | |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Environmental Systems Engineering, Sejong Campus, Korea University, 2511, Sejong-ro, Jochiwon-eup, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea | |
dc.contributor.institution | Guangdong Key Laboratory of Membrane Materials and Speration Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Advanced Technology, CAS, Haibin Road #1121, Nansha District, Guangzhou, 511458, China | |
dc.contributor.institution | Qingdao Yonglixing Water Purification Technology Ltd Company, Miaoling Road #36, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 511458, China | |
kaust.person | Kim, Youngjin | |
kaust.person | Li, Sheng | |
kaust.person | Ghaffour, Noreddine | |
kaust.grant.number | CRG2017 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-01-13T13:09:17Z | |
kaust.acknowledged.supportUnit | Competitive Research | |
kaust.acknowledged.supportUnit | Water Desalination and Reuse Center (WDRC) | |
dc.date.published-online | 2019-12-10 | |
dc.date.published-print | 2020-02 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Articles
-
Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division
For more information visit: https://bese.kaust.edu.sa/ -
Environmental Science and Engineering Program
For more information visit: https://bese.kaust.edu.sa/study/Pages/EnSE.aspx -
Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC)