Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Peter
dc.contributor.authorRELISH Consortium
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Yaoqi
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-27T05:43:05Z
dc.date.available2019-11-27T05:43:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-03
dc.identifier.citationLarge expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search. (2019). Database. doi:10.1093/database/baz085
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/database/baz085
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/660252
dc.description.abstractDocument recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.
dc.description.sponsorshipGriffith University Gowonda HPC Cluster; Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/baz085/5608006
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/database/baz085
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
dc.rightsThis file is an open access version redistributed from: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baz085
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleLarge expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalDatabase
dc.eprint.versionPublisher's Version/PDF
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
dc.contributor.institutionInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
dc.description.notesKAUST contributor is member of RELISH Consortium
kaust.personVoolstra, Christian R.
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-21T11:21:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
large expert.pdf
Size:
1.965Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Published version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.