Reply to the ‘Comment on “The chemical reactions in electrosprays of water do not always correspond to those at the pristine air–water interface”’ by A. J. Colussi and S. Enami, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, DOI: 10.1039/c9sc00991d
AuthorsGallo Junior, Adair
Farinha, Andreia S. F.
Emwas, Abdul-Hamid M.
Nielsen, Robert J.
Goddard, William A.
KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences (BESE), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Environmental Science and Engineering Program
Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC)
KAUST Grant NumberOSR-2016-CRG5-2992
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/656493
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe air–water interface serves as a crucial site for numerous chemical and physical processes in environmental science and engineering, such as cloud chemistry, ocean-atmosphere exchange, and wastewater treatment. The development of “surface-selective” techniques for probing interfacial properties of water therefore lies at the forefront of research in chemical science. Recently, researchers have adapted electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS) to generate microdroplets of water to investigate interfacial phenomena at thermodynamic equilibrium. In contrast, using a broad set of experimental and theoretical techniques, we found that electrosprays of water could facilitate partially hydrated (gas-phase) ions (e.g., H3O+·(H2O)2) to drive/catalyze chemical reactions that are otherwise not possible to accomplish by purely interfacial effects (e.g., enhanced water–hydrophobe surface area) (Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 2566). Thus, techniques exploiting electrosprays of water cannot be relied upon as generalized surface-selective platforms. Here, we respond to the comments raised by Colussi & Enami (Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, DOI: 10.1039/c9sc00991d) on our paper.
CitationGallo, A., Farinha, A. S. F., Emwas, A.-H., Santana, A., Nielsen, R. J., Goddard, W. A., & Mishra, H. (2019). Reply to the “Comment on ‘The chemical reactions in electrosprays of water do not always correspond to those at the pristine air–water interface’” by A. J. Colussi and S. Enami, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, DOI: 10.1039/c9sc00991d. Chemical Science. doi:10.1039/c9sc02702e
SponsorsThe research reported in this publication was supported by funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (#OSR-2016-CRG5-2992). The co-authors thank Dr Mahmoud Ibrahim (KAUST) for his assistance with the 1H-NMR experiments, Professor Richard Saykally and Professor Evan Williams (University of California Berkeley) for fruitful discussions, and Dr Virginia Unkefer (KAUST) for her assistance in editing the manuscript.
PublisherRoyal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.