Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoteit, Hussein
dc.contributor.authorFahs, Marwan
dc.contributor.authorSoltanian, Mohamad Reza
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T11:38:25Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T11:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-05
dc.identifier.citationHoteit H, Fahs M, Soltanian MR (2019) Assessment of CO2 Injectivity During Sequestration in Depleted Gas Reservoirs. Geosciences 9: 199. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050199.
dc.identifier.issn2076-3263
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/geosciences9050199
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/652861
dc.description.abstractDepleted gas reservoirs are appealing targets for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration because of their storage capacity, proven seal, reservoir characterization knowledge, existing infrastructure, and potential for enhanced gas recovery. Low abandonment pressure in the reservoir provides additional voidage-replacement potential for CO 2 and allows for a low surface pump pressure during the early period of injection. However, the injection process poses several challenges. This work aims to raise awareness of key operational challenges related to CO 2 injection in low-pressure reservoirs and to provide a new approach to assessing the phase behavior of CO 2 within the wellbore. When the reservoir pressure is below the CO 2 bubble-point pressure, and CO 2 is injected in its liquid or supercritical state, CO 2 will vaporize and expand within the well-tubing or in the near-wellbore region of the reservoir. This phenomenon is associated with several flow assurance problems. For instance, when CO 2 transitions from the dense-state to the gas-state, CO 2 density drops sharply, affecting the wellhead pressure control and the pressure response at the well bottom-hole. As CO 2 expands with a lower phase viscosity, the flow velocity increases abruptly, possibly causing erosion and cavitation in the flowlines. Furthermore, CO 2 expansion is associated with the Joule–Thomson (IJ) effect, which may result in dry ice or hydrate formation and therefore may reduce CO 2 injectivity. Understanding the transient multiphase phase flow behavior of CO 2 within the wellbore is crucial for appropriate well design and operational risk assessment. The commonly used approach analyzes the flow in the wellbore without taking into consideration the transient pressure response of the reservoir, which predicts an unrealistic pressure gap at the wellhead. This pressure gap is related to the phase transition of CO 2 from its dense state to the gas state. In this work, a new coupled approach is introduced to address the phase behavior of CO 2 within the wellbore under different operational conditions. The proposed approach integrates the flow within both the wellbore and the reservoir at the transient state and therefore resolves the pressure gap issue. Finally, the energy costs associated with a mitigation process that involves CO 2 heating at the wellhead are assessed.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first author would like to thank Schlumberger Ltd. for granting KAUST academic licenses for Eclipse, and would like also to thank Calsep for providing an academic license for PVTsim Nova.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/9/5/199/htm
dc.rightsThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCO2 sequestration
dc.subjectdepleted gas reservoirs
dc.subjectflow assurance
dc.subjectJoule–Thomson effect
dc.subjectCO2 hydrates
dc.titleAssessment of CO2 Injectivity During Sequestration in Depleted Gas Reservoirs
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentAli I. Al-Naimi Petroleum Engineering Research Center (ANPERC)
dc.contributor.departmentEnergy Resources and Petroleum Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentPhysical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
dc.identifier.journalGeosciences
dc.eprint.versionPublisher's Version/PDF
dc.contributor.institutionLaboratoire d’Hydrologie et Geochemie de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg/ENGEES/CNRS, 67084 Strasbourg, France
dc.contributor.institutionDepartments of Geology and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
kaust.personHoteit, Hussein
refterms.dateFOA2019-05-13T12:52:23Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
geosciences-09-00199.pdf
Size:
1.570Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Published version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).