Auto-ignition of direct injection spray of light naphtha, primary reference fuels, gasoline and gasoline surrogate
Badra, Jihad A.
Roberts, William L.
KAUST DepartmentChemical Engineering Program
Clean Combustion Research Center
Combustion and Pyrolysis Chemistry (CPC) Group
Mechanical Engineering Program
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
high-pressure combustion (HPC) Research Group
Online Publication Date2018-12-23
Print Publication Date2019-03
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/631171
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIn this work, the spray and auto-ignition characteristics of light naphtha (LN), primary reference fuels (PRF65, PRF95), Haltermann gasoline (CARB LEVIII, 10 vol% ethanol), and a gasoline surrogate were studied in an optically accessible constant volume combustion chamber. An outwardly opening hollow cone piezoelectric gasoline direct injection fuel injector was used. Five ambient temperatures from 650 to 950 K with a 75 K step were selected with a fixed ambient density of 3.5 kg/m, similar to the Spray G density defined by the engine combustion network (ECN). Fuel auto-ignition was achieved with varying ignition delays for the five investigated fuels depending on the selected experimental conditions. Results show that the auto-ignition locations are randomly distributed in the combustion chamber. Differences in ignition delay times among the five fuels are more significant when the ambient temperature is lower than 750 K. When the ambient temperature is lower than 750 K, PRF95 always has the longest ignition delay and LN has the shortest. Ignition delays of the five fuels are almost identical when the ambient temperature exceeds 750 K. Meanwhile, the five fuels have a similar spray front penetration length and spray angles before the occurrence of auto-ignition under all the investigated conditions.
CitationWang L, Wu Z, Ahmed A, Badra JA, Sarathy SM, et al. (2019) Auto-ignition of direct injection spray of light naphtha, primary reference fuels, gasoline and gasoline surrogate. Energy 170: 375–390. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.144.
SponsorsThis research was supported in part by the Saudi Aramco R&D Center through the Clean Combustion Research Center of the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology under the FUELCOM program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.