Organic carbon sequestration and storage in vegetated coastal habitats along the western coast of the Arabian Gulf
Name:
Cusack_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_074007.pdf
Size:
1.841Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Published version
Type
ArticleAuthors
Cusack, MichaelSaderne, Vincent
Arias-Ortiz, Ariane
Masque, Pere
Krishnakumar, Periyadan
Rabaoui, Lotfi
Qurban, Mohammad Ali
Qasem, Ali
Prihartato, Perdana K
Loughland, Ronald Anthony
Elyas, Alaa
Duarte, Carlos M.

KAUST Department
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) DivisionMarine Science Program
Red Sea Research Center (RSRC)
Date
2018-06-27Online Publication Date
2018-06-27Print Publication Date
2018-07-01Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/628415
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Certain coastal ecosystems such as mangrove, saltmarsh and seagrass habitats have been identified as significant natural carbon sinks, through the sequestration and storage of carbon in their biomass and sediments, collectively known as 'blue carbon' ecosystems. These ecosystems can often thrive in extreme environments where terrestrial systems otherwise survive at the limit of their existence, such as in arid and desert regions of the globe. To further our understanding of the capability of blue carbon ecosystems to sequester and store carbon in such extreme climates, we measured carbon sediment stocks in 25 sites along the Western Arabian Gulf coast. While seagrass meadows and saltmarsh habitats were widely distributed along the coast, mangrove stands were much reduced as a result of anthropogenic pressures, with 90% of stands having been lost over the last century. Carbon stocks in 1 m deep surface sediments were similar across all three blue carbon habitats, with comparable stocks for saltmarsh (81 ± 22 Mg Corg ha−1), seagrass (76 ± 20 Mg Corg ha−1) and mangroves (76 ± 23 Mg Corg ha−1). We recorded a 38% decrease in carbon stocks between mature established mangrove stands (91 Mg Corg ha−1) and recently planted mangroves (56 Mg Corg ha−1). Mangroves also had the lowest carbon stock per total area owing to their very limited spatial coverage along the coast. The largest stock per total area belonged to seagrass beds as a result of their large spatial coverage within the Gulf. We employed 210Pb dating to determine the sediment accretion rates in each ecosystem and found mangrove habitats to be the most efficient carbon sequesters over the past century, with the highest carbon burial rate of the three ecosystems (19 g Corg m−2 yr−1), followed by seagrass (9 g Corg m−2 yr−1) and saltmarshes (8 g Corg m−2 yr−1). In this work, we describe a comprehensive comparison of sediment stocks in different blue carbon ecosystems within a single marine environment and across a large geographical area, and discuss our results in a global context for other blue carbon ecosystems in the dry tropics.Citation
Cusack M, Saderne V, Arias-Ortiz A, Masqué P, Krishnakumar PK, et al. (2018) Organic carbon sequestration and storage in vegetated coastal habitats along the western coast of the Arabian Gulf. Environmental Research Letters 13: 074007. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac899.Sponsors
This work was supported by a grant from Saudi Aramco. Further funding was provided to PM by the Generalitat de Catalunya (MERS, 2017SGR 1588) and an Australian Research Council LIEF Project (LE170100219). This work is contributing to the ICTA 'Unit of Excellence' (MinECo, MDM2015-0552). The authors thank the staff at the Marine Studies department of the Centre for Environment and Water of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, for their support and expertise, especially R Lindo, R Magalles, P Bacquiran and M Lopez. We also thank I Schulz, N Geraldi, D Prabowo and R Diaz at KAUST and G Salgao at ECU for their technical support.Publisher
IOP PublishingJournal
Environmental Research LettersAdditional Links
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aac899ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/1748-9326/aac899
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.