Ignition delay time sensitivity in ignition quality tester (IQT) and its relation to octane sensitivity
KAUST DepartmentClean Combustion Research Center
Online Publication Date2018-06-22
Print Publication Date2018-12
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/628073
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractCetane number (CN) is a commonly used metric to rate the ignition quality of distillate fuels. In this work, a concept of sensitivity in ignition delay time (IDT) obtained with an ignition quality tester (IQT) is proposed, which is correlated to octane sensitivity (OS), i.e., the difference between research octane number (RON) and motor octane number (MON). The concept is based on the determination of IDT using the ASTM D6890 standard and IDT obtained at a temperature lower than that prescribed by the standard. The IDT measured at this lower temperature is referred to as IDT_l , which is obtained via a calibration procedure similar to the ASTM D6890 standard, but with a higher value of reference IDT for calibration with n-heptane. The IDT_h (measured at the derived cetane number (DCN) ASTM D6890 condition) of a given test fuel and a binary primary reference fuel (PRF) mixture of iso- octane and n-heptane was measured to identify a PRF with matching IDT_h as the test fuel. The ratio of low temperature IDTs of the non-PRF test fuel and PRF, i.e., IDT_l,non-PRF/IDT_l,PRF was defined as IDT sensitivity (IDS), which was correlated with the OS of the test fuel. The RON and MON values of a wide range of fuel classes including surrogate fuels and fully blended practical fuels were estimated, and showed satisfactory agreement with measured RON/MON values. The RON values of many pure components that could not be measured with standard test methods were also estimated. Two certification diesels and Saudi Arabian pump grade diesel were also tested.
CitationNaser, N., Sarathy, S. M., & Chung, S. H. (2018). Ignition delay time sensitivity in ignition quality tester (IQT) and its relation to octane sensitivity. Fuel, 233, 412–419. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.131