Type
ArticleAuthors
Jasra, Ajay
Law, Kody
Suciu, Carina
KAUST Department
Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) DivisionComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, KSA
KAUST Grant Number
CRG4Date
2020-03-03Preprint Posting Date
2017-04-24Embargo End Date
2021-03-03Submitted Date
2019-06-10Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/626463
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article reviews the application of some advanced Monte Carlo techniques in the context of multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC). MLMC is a strategy employed to compute expectations, which can be biassed in some sense, for instance, by using the discretization of an associated probability law. The MLMC approach works with a hierarchy of biassed approximations, which become progressively more accurate and more expensive. Using a telescoping representation of the most accurate approximation, the method is able to reduce the computational cost for a given level of error versus i.i.d. sampling from this latter approximation. All of these ideas originated for cases where exact sampling from couples in the hierarchy is possible. This article considers the case where such exact sampling is not currently possible. We consider some Markov chain Monte Carlo and sequential Monte Carlo methods, which have been introduced in the literature, and we describe different strategies that facilitate the application of MLMC within these methods.Citation
Jasra, A., Law, K., & Suciu, C. (2020). Advanced Multilevel Monte Carlo Methods. International Statistical Review. doi:10.1111/insr.12365Sponsors
A. J. and C. S. were supported under the KAUST Competitive Research Grants Program—Round 4 (CRG4) project, advanced multilevel sampling techniques for Bayesian inverse problems with applications to subsurface, ref: 2584. K. J. H. L. was supported by Oak RidgeNational Laboratory (ORNL) Directed Research and Development Seed funding and much ofthis work was performed while he was a staff member at ORNL. We thank the editor and two reviewers whose comments have greatly improved the paper.Publisher
WileyJournal
International Statistical ReviewarXiv
1704.07272Additional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/insr.12365ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/insr.12365