Current state of seagrass ecosystem services: Research and policy integration
KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Marine Science Program
Red Sea Research Center (RSRC)
Online Publication Date2017-10-12
Print Publication Date2017-11
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/626036
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractSeagrasses contribute to the maintenance of human wellbeing. However certain aspects of their role as ecosystem service (ES) providers remain understudied. Here, we synthesise the state of seagrass ES (SGES) research and policy implications. Additionally, we recommend ways in which SGES research can be integrated in to policy design, by drawing lessons from the case of Blue Carbon (BC). SGES research suffers from three main biases: a geographical bias, SGES has been restricted to chartered seagrass areas; a type of service research bias, provisioning and regulating services have received extensive attention while cultural services remain understudied; a type of discipline bias, the ecological aspects of SGES have been well documented while economic and social aspects remain in comparison understudied. These are particularly important, as an understanding of the social and economic considerations of the provision of ES is fundamental to facilitate its integration into policy frameworks. Lessons drawn from the operationalization process of BC show the reoccurrence of certain aspects that have enabled the integration of BC into policy. These aspects are grouped under 4 different categories. From the analysis of these elements we draw lessons that could facilitate the operationalization of other ecosystem services and their incorporation into management policy frameworks.
CitationRuiz-Frau A, Gelcich S, Hendriks IE, Duarte CM, Marbà N (2017) Current state of seagrass ecosystem services: Research and policy integration. Ocean & Coastal Management 149: 107–115. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.004.
SponsorsThe authors would like to genuinely thank the contribution of the anonymous reviewers whose suggestions greatly improved the quality of the present publication. Funding: this study was funded by the EU FP7 OPERAs (contract no. 308393).
JournalOcean & Coastal Management