Revisiting fracture gradient: Comments on “A new approaching method to estimate fracture gradient by correcting Matthew–Kelly and Eaton's stress ratio”
KAUST DepartmentEarth Science and Engineering Program
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Ali I. Al-Naimi Petroleum Engineering Research Center (ANPERC), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
Online Publication Date2017-07-25
Print Publication Date2018-03
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/625260
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractA study performed by Marbun et al.  claimed that “A new methodology to predict fracture pressure from former calculations, Matthew–Kelly and Eaton are proposed.” Also, Marbun et al.'s paper stated that “A new value of Poisson's and a stress ratio of the formation were generated and the accuracy of fracture gradient was improved.” We found those all statements are incorrect and some misleading concepts are revealed. An attempt to expose the method of fracture gradient determination from industry practice also appears to solidify that our arguments are acceptable to against improper Marbun et al.'s claims.
CitationHakiki F, Shidqi M (2017) Revisiting fracture gradient: Comments on “A new approaching method to estimate fracture gradient by correcting Matthew–Kelly and Eaton’s stress ratio.” Petroleum. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2017.07.001.
SponsorsThe authors appreciate Mr. Andika Perbawa at KAUST, Saudi Arabia and Dr. Henry Pasaribu at Shell Global Solutions, Netherlands for their fruitful discussion.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/