A Historical Review of Diachrony and Semantic Dimensions of Trace in Neurosciences and Lacanian Psychoanalysis
KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/625158
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractExperience leaves a trace in the nervous system through plasticity. However, the exact meaning of the mnesic trace is poorly defined in current literature. This article provides a historical review of the term trace in neuroscience and psychoanalysis literature, to highlight two relevant aspects: the diachronic and the semantic dimensions. There has been a general interest in diachrony, or a form of evolution of the trace, but its indissociable semantic dimension remains partially disregarded. Although frequently implied, the diachronic and semantic dimensions of the trace are rarely clearly articulated. We situate this discussion into the classical opposition of syntax, or rules of inscription of the trace in the nervous system, and semantics, or the content of the trace, which takes into consideration the attempt of the human being to build coherence. A general observation is that the study of the term trace follows trends of the thought of the given epoch. This historical analysis also reveals the decay of the idea that the trace is reliable to the experience. From the articulation between neurosciences and psychoanalysis in a historical perspective, this review shows that the trend is to consider trace as a production of the subject, resulting in a permanent rewriting in an attempt to give meaning to the experience. This trend is becoming increasingly evident in light of recent research in neurosciences and psychoanalysis.
CitationEscobar C, Ansermet F, Magistretti PJ (2017) A Historical Review of Diachrony and Semantic Dimensions of Trace in Neurosciences and Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Frontiers in Psychology 8. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00734.
PublisherFrontiers Media SA
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
- The homeostatic psyche: Freudian theory and somatic markers.
- Authors: Arminjon M, Ansermet F, Magistretti P
- Issue date: 2010 Nov
- [Psychoanalysis and neuroscience: the end of a schism ?].
- Authors: Lotstra F
- Issue date: 2007 Mar-Apr
- Psychoanalysis and the neurosciences: a topical debate on dreams.
- Authors: Mancia M
- Issue date: 1999 Dec
- A historical perspective on the collaboration between psychoanalysis and neuroscience.
- Authors: Sauvagnat F, Wiss M, Clément S
- Issue date: 2010 Dec
- [Malaise in psychiatry and its history].
- Authors: Chebili S
- Issue date: 2016 Apr