Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities
KAUST DepartmentRed Sea Research Center (RSRC)
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractSequencing environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly being used as an alternative to traditional morphological-based identification to characterize biological assemblages and monitor anthropogenic impacts in marine environments. Most studies only assess eDNA which, compared to eRNA, can persist longer in the environment after cell death. Therefore, eRNA may provide a more immediate census of the environment due to its relatively weaker stability, leading some researchers to advocate for the use of eRNA as an additional, or perhaps superior proxy for portraying ecological changes. A variety of pre-treatment techniques for screening eDNA and eRNA derived operational taxonomic units (OTUs) have been employed prior to statistical analyses, including removing singleton taxa (i.e., OTUs found only once) and discarding those not present in both eDNA and eRNA datasets. In this study, we used bacterial (16S ribosomal RNA gene) and eukaryotic (18S ribosomal RNA gene) eDNA- and eRNA-derived data from benthic communities collected at increasing distances along a transect from an oil production platform (Taranaki, New Zealand). Macro-infauna (visual classification of benthic invertebrates) and physico-chemical data were analyzed in parallel. We tested the effect of removing singleton taxa, and removing taxa not present in the eDNA and eRNA libraries from the same environmental sample (trimmed by shared OTUs), by comparing the impact of the oil production platform on alpha- and beta-diversity of the eDNA/eRNA-based biological assemblages, and by correlating these to the morphologically identified macro-faunal communities and the physico-chemical data. When trimmed by singletons, presence/absence information from eRNA data represented the best proxy to detect changes on species diversity for both bacteria and eukaryotes. However, assessment of quantitative beta-diversity from read abundance information of bacteria eRNA did not, contrary to eDNA, reveal any impact from the oil production activity. Overall, the data appeared more robust when trimmed by shared OTUs, showing a greater effect of the platform on alpha- and beta-diversity. Trimming by shared OTUs likely removes taxa derived from legacy DNA and technical artefacts introduced through reverse transcriptase, polymerase-chain-reaction and sequencing. Findings from our scoping study suggest that metabarcoding-based biomonitoring surveys should, if funds, time and expertise allow, be assessed using both eDNA and eRNA products.
CitationLaroche O, Wood SA, Tremblay LA, Lear G, Ellis JI, et al. (2017) Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities. PeerJ 5: e3347. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3347.
SponsorsThis research was co-funded by the Cawthron Institute Internal Investment Fund (IIF #15955) and the ``Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Natures et Technologies'' as part of a doctoral research scholarship (grant ID#184395). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Archived with thanks to PeerJ. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
- Wanted dead or alive? Using metabarcoding of environmental DNA and RNA to distinguish living assemblages for biosecurity applications.
- Authors: Pochon X, Zaiko A, Fletcher LM, Laroche O, Wood SA
- Issue date: 2017
- A cross-taxa study using environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding to measure biological impacts of offshore oil and gas drilling and production operations.
- Authors: Laroche O, Wood SA, Tremblay LA, Ellis JI, Lear G, Pochon X
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Predicting the Ecological Quality Status of Marine Environments from eDNA Metabarcoding Data Using Supervised Machine Learning.
- Authors: Cordier T, Esling P, Lejzerowicz F, Visco J, Ouadahi A, Martins C, Cedhagen T, Pawlowski J
- Issue date: 2017 Aug 15
- First evaluation of foraminiferal metabarcoding for monitoring environmental impact from an offshore oil drilling site.
- Authors: Laroche O, Wood SA, Tremblay LA, Ellis JI, Lejzerowicz F, Pawlowski J, Lear G, Atalah J, Pochon X
- Issue date: 2016 Sep
- Accurate assessment of the impact of salmon farming on benthic sediment enrichment using foraminiferal metabarcoding.
- Authors: Pochon X, Wood SA, Keeley NB, Lejzerowicz F, Esling P, Drew J, Pawlowski J
- Issue date: 2015 Nov 15