Evaluation of thermal and dynamic impacts of summer dust aerosols on the Red Sea
KAUST DepartmentPhysical Sciences and Engineering (PSE) Division
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/623273
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe seasonal response of upper ocean processes in the Red Sea to summer-time dust aerosol perturbations is investigated using an uncoupled regional ocean model. We find that the upper limit response is highly sensitive to dust-induced reductions in radiative fluxes. Sea surface cooling of −1°C and −2°C is predicted in the northern and southern regions, respectively. This cooling is associated with a net radiation reduction of −40 W m−2 and −90 W m−2 over the northern and southern regions, respectively. Larger cooling occurs below the mixed layer at 75 m in autumn, −1.2°C (north) and −1.9°C (south). SSTs adjust more rapidly (ca. 30 days) than the subsurface temperatures (seasonal time scales), due to stronger stratification and increased mixed layer stability inhibiting the extent of vertical mixing. The basin average annual heat flux reverses sign and becomes positive, +4.2 W m−2 (as compared to observed estimates −17.3 W m−2) indicating a small gain of heat from the atmosphere. When we consider missing feedbacks from atmospheric processes in our uncoupled experiment, we postulate that the magnitude of cooling and the time scales for adjustment will be much less, and that the annual heat flux will not reverse sign but nevertheless be reduced as a result of dust perturbations. While our study highlights the importance of considering coupled ocean-atmosphere processes on the net surface energy flux in dust perturbation studies, the results of our uncoupled dust experiment still provide an upper limit estimate of the response of the upper ocean to dust-induced radiative forcing perturbations.
CitationCahill B, Toumi R, Stenchikov G, Osipov S, Brindley H (2017) Evaluation of thermal and dynamic impacts of summer dust aerosols on the Red Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122: 1325–1346. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016jc011911.
SponsorsWe would like to thank Ron Miller and an anonymous reviewer who provided tremendous insight and exceptionally constructive comments during the preparation of this publication. The research reported in this publication was supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Thuwal, Saudi Arabia, by the Natural Environment Research Council and by the BP Environmental Technology Program. The computer resources were partially provided by the KAUST Supercomputing Laboratory. Output of the ROMS simulations used in our analysis is available from Space and Atmospheric Physics, Imperial College London. Contact Bronwyn Cahill (firstname.lastname@example.org) or Ralf Toumi (email@example.com) for further information.