KAUST DepartmentEarth Science and Engineering Program
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
Seismic Wave Analysis Group
Online Publication Date2016-09-21
Print Publication Date2016-11
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/622065
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractA successful full-waveform inversion implementation updates the low-wavenumber model components first for a proper description of the wavefield propagation and slowly adds the high wavenumber potentially scattering parts of the model. The low-wavenumber components can be extracted from the transmission parts of the recorded wavefield emanating directly from the source or the transmission parts from the single- or double-scattered wavefield computed from a predicted scatter field acting as secondary sources.We use a combined inversion of data modeled from the source and those corresponding to single and double scattering to update the velocity model and the component of the velocity (perturbation) responsible for the single and double scattering. The combined inversion helps us access most of the potential model wavenumber information that may be embedded in the data. A scattering-angle filter is used to divide the gradient of the combined inversion, so initially the high-wavenumber (low-scattering-angle) components of the gradient are directed to the perturbation model and the low-wavenumber (highscattering- angle) components are directed to the velocity model. As our background velocity matures, the scatteringangle divide is slowly lowered to allow for more of the higher wavenumbers to contribute the velocity model. Synthetic examples including the Marmousi model are used to demonstrate the additional illumination and improved velocity inversion obtained when including multiscattered energy. © 2016 Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
CitationAlkhalifah T, Wu Z (2016) Multiscattering inversion for low-model wavenumbers. GEOPHYSICS 81: R417–R428. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/GEO2015-0650.1.
SponsorsWe thank KAUST for its support. We also thank A. Guitton, J. Cheng, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that ultimately helped to improve the paper.
PublisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicists