KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division
Center for Desert Agriculture
The Salt Lab
Online Publication Date2016-10-05
Print Publication Date2017-01
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/622040
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground Because soil salinity is a major abiotic constraint affecting crop yield, much research has been conducted to develop plants with improved salinity tolerance. Salinity stress impacts many aspects of a plant’s physiology, making it difficult to study in toto. Instead, it is more tractable to dissect the plant’s response into traits that are hypothesized to be involved in the overall tolerance of the plant to salinity. Scope and conclusions We discuss how to quantify the impact of salinity on different traits, such as relative growth rate, water relations, transpiration, transpiration use efficiency, ionic relations, photosynthesis, senescence, yield and yield components. We also suggest some guidelines to assist with the selection of appropriate experimental systems, imposition of salinity stress, and obtaining and analysing relevant physiological data using appropriate indices. We illustrate how these indices can be used to identify relationships amongst the proposed traits to identify which traits are the most important contributors to salinity tolerance. Salinity tolerance is complex and involves many genes, but progress has been made in studying the mechanisms underlying a plant’s response to salinity. Nevertheless, several previous studies on salinity tolerance could have benefited from improved experimental design. We hope that this paper will provide pertinent information to researchers on performing proficient assays and interpreting results from salinity tolerance experiments.
CitationNegrão S, Schmöckel SM, Tester M (2016) Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Annals of Botany: mcw191. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191.
SponsorsThe research reported in this publication was supported by funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We thank Dr Christina Morris and Virginia Unkefer for editing the manuscript and Dr David E. Jarvis for providing us with unpublished data.
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)
JournalAnnals of Botany
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.