Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis – low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery
LCC of a hybrid FO-LPRO Rodrigo et al 2015.pdf
AuthorsValladares Linares, Rodrigo
Amy, Gary L.
Vrouwenvelder, Johannes S.
KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Environmental Science and Engineering Program
Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC)
Online Publication Date2015-10-23
Print Publication Date2016-01
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/604081
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIn recent years, forward osmosis (FO) hybrid membrane systems have been investigated as an alternative to conventional high-pressure membrane processes (i.e. reverse osmosis (RO)) for seawater desalination and wastewater treatment and recovery. Nevertheless, their economic advantage in comparison to conventional processes for seawater desalination and municipal wastewater treatment has not been clearly addressed. This work presents a detailed economic analysis on capital and operational expenses (CAPEX and OPEX) for: i) a hybrid forward osmosis – low-pressure reverse osmosis (FO-LPRO) process, ii) a conventional seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination process, and iii) a membrane bioreactor – reverse osmosis – advanced oxidation process (MBR-RO-AOP) for wastewater treatment and reuse. The most important variables affecting economic feasibility are obtained through a sensitivity analysis of a hybrid FO-LPRO system. The main parameters taken into account for the life cycle costs are the water quality characteristics (similar feed water and similar water produced), production capacity of 100,000 m3 d−1 of potable water, energy consumption, materials, maintenance, operation, RO and FO module costs, and chemicals. Compared to SWRO, the FO-LPRO systems have a 21% higher CAPEX and a 56% lower OPEX due to savings in energy consumption and fouling control. In terms of the total water cost per cubic meter of water produced, the hybrid FO-LPRO desalination system has a 16% cost reduction compared to the benchmark for desalination, mainly SWRO. Compared to the MBR-RO-AOP, the FO-LPRO systems have a 7% lower CAPEX and 9% higher OPEX, resulting in no significant cost reduction per m3 produced by FO-LPRO. Hybrid FO-LPRO membrane systems are shown to have an economic advantage compared to current available technology for desalination, and comparable costs with a wastewater treatment and recovery system. Based on development on FO membrane modules, packing density, and water permeability, the total water cost could be further reduced.
CitationLife cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis – low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery 2016, 88:225 Water Research
SponsorsThe authors thank the kind contribution of Mr. Muhannad Abu-Ghdaib and Dr. Lijo Francis. The authors appreciate the assistance offered by the Water Desalination and Reuse Center (WDRC) technical staff at KAUST to conduct this research work.
- A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes.
- Authors: Hancock NT, Black ND, Cath TY
- Issue date: 2012 Mar 15
- Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse.
- Authors: Valladares Linares R, Li Z, Sarp S, Bucs SS, Amy G, Vrouwenvelder JS
- Issue date: 2014 Dec 1
- Efficiently Combining Water Reuse and Desalination through Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis (FO-RO) Hybrids: A Critical Review.
- Authors: Blandin G, Verliefde AR, Comas J, Rodriguez-Roda I, Le-Clech P
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 1
- Forward osmosis membrane modular configurations for osmotic dilution of seawater by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis hybrid system.
- Authors: Kim JE, Phuntsho S, Ali SM, Choi JY, Shon HK
- Issue date: 2018 Jan 1
- Comprehensive analysis of a hybrid FO/crystallization/RO process for improving its economic feasibility to seawater desalination.
- Authors: Park K, Kim DY, Jang YH, Kim MG, Yang DR, Hong S
- Issue date: 2020 Mar 15