Temporal Changes in Extracellular Polymeric Substances on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Membrane Surfaces in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor
Nunes, Suzana Pereira
Vrouwenvelder, Johannes S.
KAUST DepartmentWater Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC)
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractMembrane surface hydrophilic modification has always been considered to mitigating biofouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Four hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membranes (pore sizes ∼0.1 μm) differing only in hydrophobic or hydrophilic surface characteristics were operated at a permeate flux of 10 L/m2.h in the same lab-scale MBR fed with synthetic wastewater. In addition, identical membrane modules without permeate production (0 L/m2.h) were operated in the same lab-scale MBR. Membrane modules were autopsied after 1, 10, 20 and 30 days of MBR operation, and total extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) accumulated on the membranes were extracted and characterized in detail using several analytical tools, including conventional colorimetric tests (Lowry and Dubois), liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-OCD), fluorescence excitation - emission matrices (FEEM), fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). The transmembrane pressure (TMP) quickly stabilized with higher values for the hydrophobic membranes than hydrophilic ones. The sulfonated polysulfone (SPSU) membrane had the highest negatively charged membrane surface, accumulated the least amount of foulants and displayed the lowest TMP. The same type of organic foulants developed with time on the four membranes and the composition of biopolymers shifted from protein dominance at early stages of filtration (day 1) towards polysaccharides dominance during later stages of MBR filtration. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of LC-OCD data showed that biofilm samples clustered according to the sampling event (time) regardless of the membrane surface chemistry (hydrophobic or hydrophilic) or operating mode (with or without permeate flux). These results suggest that EPS composition may not be the dominant parameter for evaluating membrane performance and possibly other parameters such as biofilm thickness, porosity, compactness and structure should be considered in future studies for evaluating the development and impact of biofouling on membrane performance.
CitationTemporal Changes in Extracellular Polymeric Substances on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Membrane Surfaces in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor 2016 Water Research
SponsorsThis work was sponsored by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
- Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
- Authors: Malaeb L, Le-Clech P, Vrouwenvelder JS, Ayoub GM, Saikaly PE
- Issue date: 2013 Oct 1
- Comparison of membrane foulants occurred under different sub-critical flux conditions in a membrane bioreactor (MBR).
- Authors: Nguyen TN, Su YC, Pan JR, Huang C
- Issue date: 2014 Aug
- TiO2 and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) coated polyester filter in bioreactor for wastewater treatment.
- Authors: Liu L, Zhao C, Yang F
- Issue date: 2012 Apr 15
- Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
- Authors: Sweity A, Ying W, Ali-Shtayeh MS, Yang F, Bick A, Oron G, Herzberg M
- Issue date: 2011 Dec 1
- Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR.
- Authors: Khan SJ, Ahmad A, Nawaz MS, Hankins NP
- Issue date: 2014