Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGleicher, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, D.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R.
dc.contributor.authorJusufi, I.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, C. D.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J. C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-28T06:44:20Z
dc.date.available2016-02-28T06:44:20Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-07
dc.identifier.citationGleicher M, Albers D, Walker R, Jusufi I, Hansen CD, et al. (2011) Visual comparison for information visualization. Information Visualization 10: 289–309. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473871611416549.
dc.identifier.issn1473-8716
dc.identifier.issn1473-8724
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1473871611416549
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/600172
dc.description.abstractData analysis often involves the comparison of complex objects. With the ever increasing amounts and complexity of data, the demand for systems to help with these comparisons is also growing. Increasingly, information visualization tools support such comparisons explicitly, beyond simply allowing a viewer to examine each object individually. In this paper, we argue that the design of information visualizations of complex objects can, and should, be studied in general, that is independently of what those objects are. As a first step in developing this general understanding of comparison, we propose a general taxonomy of visual designs for comparison that groups designs into three basic categories, which can be combined. To clarify the taxonomy and validate its completeness, we provide a survey of work in information visualization related to comparison. Although we find a great diversity of systems and approaches, we see that all designs are assembled from the building blocks of juxtaposition, superposition and explicit encodings. This initial exploration shows the power of our model, and suggests future challenges in developing a general understanding of comparative visualization and facilitating the development of more comparative visualization tools. © The Author(s) 2011.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the members of the working group at the Dagstuhl seminar for their help in developing the taxonomy and for their encouragement in exploring it.
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectComparison
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectTaxonomy
dc.titleVisual comparison for information visualization
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalInformation Visualization
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, United States
dc.contributor.institutionBangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.institutionLinnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
kaust.grant.numberKUS-C1-016-04
dc.date.published-online2011-09-07
dc.date.published-print2011-10


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record