• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Office of Sponsored Research (OSR)
    • KAUST Funded Research
    • Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Office of Sponsored Research (OSR)
    • KAUST Funded Research
    • Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of KAUSTCommunitiesIssue DateSubmit DateThis CollectionIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    Login

    Quick Links

    Open Access PolicyORCID LibguideTheses and Dissertations LibguideSubmit an Item

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Testing and Estimating Shape-Constrained Nonparametric Density and Regression in the Presence of Measurement Error

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Type
    Article
    Authors
    Carroll, Raymond J.
    Delaigle, Aurore
    Hall, Peter
    KAUST Grant Number
    KUS-CI-016-04
    Date
    2011-03
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/10754/599867
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In many applications we can expect that, or are interested to know if, a density function or a regression curve satisfies some specific shape constraints. For example, when the explanatory variable, X, represents the value taken by a treatment or dosage, the conditional mean of the response, Y , is often anticipated to be a monotone function of X. Indeed, if this regression mean is not monotone (in the appropriate direction) then the medical or commercial value of the treatment is likely to be significantly curtailed, at least for values of X that lie beyond the point at which monotonicity fails. In the case of a density, common shape constraints include log-concavity and unimodality. If we can correctly guess the shape of a curve, then nonparametric estimators can be improved by taking this information into account. Addressing such problems requires a method for testing the hypothesis that the curve of interest satisfies a shape constraint, and, if the conclusion of the test is positive, a technique for estimating the curve subject to the constraint. Nonparametric methodology for solving these problems already exists, but only in cases where the covariates are observed precisely. However in many problems, data can only be observed with measurement errors, and the methods employed in the error-free case typically do not carry over to this error context. In this paper we develop a novel approach to hypothesis testing and function estimation under shape constraints, which is valid in the context of measurement errors. Our method is based on tilting an estimator of the density or the regression mean until it satisfies the shape constraint, and we take as our test statistic the distance through which it is tilted. Bootstrap methods are used to calibrate the test. The constrained curve estimators that we develop are also based on tilting, and in that context our work has points of contact with methodology in the error-free case.
    Citation
    Carroll RJ, Delaigle A, Hall P (2011) Testing and Estimating Shape-Constrained Nonparametric Density and Regression in the Presence of Measurement Error. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106: 191–202. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10355.
    Sponsors
    Raymond J. Carroll is Distinguished Professor, Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (E-mail: carroll@stat.tamu.edu). Aurore Delaigle is Principal Researcher and Queen Elizabeth II Fellow, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia (E-mail: A.Delaigle@ms.unimelb.edu.au). Peter Hall is Professor and Federation Fellow, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia and Distinguished Professor, Department of Statistics, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616 (E-mail: halpstat@ms.unimelb.edu.au). Carroll's research was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R37-CA057030) and by award number KUS-CI-016-04, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), and by National Science Foundation Instrumentation grant number 0922866. Delaigle's research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council, and Hall's research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council and from the National Science Foundation. The authors thank the editor, the associate editor, and a referee for their valuable comments that helped improve a previous version of the manuscript.
    Publisher
    Informa UK Limited
    Journal
    Journal of the American Statistical Association
    DOI
    10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10355
    PubMed ID
    21687809
    PubMed Central ID
    PMC3115552
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10355
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Nonparametric Prediction in Measurement Error Models.
    • Authors: Carroll RJ, Delaigle A, Hall P
    • Issue date: 2009 Sep 1
    • Joint nonparametric correction estimator for excess relative risk regression in survival analysis with exposure measurement error.
    • Authors: Wang CY, Cullings H, Song X, Kopecky KJ
    • Issue date: 2017 Nov
    • Bayesian Local Extremum Splines.
    • Authors: Wheeler MW, Dunson DB, Herring AH
    • Issue date: 2017 Dec
    • Causal Isotonic Regression.
    • Authors: Westling T, Gilbert P, Carone M
    • Issue date: 2020 Jul
    • Density estimation in the presence of heteroscedastic measurement error of unknown type using phase function deconvolution.
    • Authors: Nghiem L, Potgieter CJ
    • Issue date: 2018 Nov 10
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | KAUST University Library
    Open Repository is a service hosted by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items. For anonymous users the allowed maximum amount is 50 search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.