Reference and counter electrode positions affect electrochemical characterization of bioanodes in different bioelectrochemical systems
KAUST Grant NumberKUS-I1-003-13
Online Publication Date2014-06-16
Print Publication Date2014-10
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/599480
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe placement of the reference electrode (RE) in various bioelectrochemical systems is often varied to accommodate different reactor configurations. While the effect of the RE placement is well understood from a strictly electrochemistry perspective, there are impacts on exoelectrogenic biofilms in engineered systems that have not been adequately addressed. Varying distances between the working electrode (WE) and the RE, or the RE and the counter electrode (CE) in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can alter bioanode characteristics. With well-spaced anode and cathode distances in an MFC, increasing the distance between the RE and anode (WE) altered bioanode cyclic voltammograms (CVs) due to the uncompensated ohmic drop. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) also changed with RE distances, resulting in a calculated increase in anode resistance that varied between 17 and 31Ω (-0.2V). While WE potentials could be corrected with ohmic drop compensation during the CV tests, they could not be automatically corrected by the potentiostat in the EIS tests. The electrochemical characteristics of bioanodes were altered by their acclimation to different anode potentials that resulted from varying the distance between the RE and the CE (cathode). These differences were true changes in biofilm characteristics because the CVs were electrochemically independent of conditions resulting from changing CE to RE distances. Placing the RE outside of the current path enabled accurate bioanode characterization using CVs and EIS due to negligible ohmic resistances (0.4Ω). It is therefore concluded for bioelectrochemical systems that when possible, the RE should be placed outside the current path and near the WE, as this will result in more accurate representation of bioanode characteristics. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
CitationZhang F, Liu J, Ivanov I, Hatzell MC, Yang W, et al. (2014) Reference and counter electrode positions affect electrochemical characterization of bioanodes in different bioelectrochemical systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 111: 1931–1939. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.25253.
SponsorsContract grant sponsor: Award KUS-I1-003-13 from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
JournalBiotechnology and Bioengineering
CollectionsPublications Acknowledging KAUST Support
- Biotic and abiotic characterization of bioanodes formed on oxidized carbon electrodes as a basis to predict their performance.
- Authors: Cercado B, Cházaro-Ruiz LF, Ruiz V, López-Prieto Ide J, Buitrón G, Razo-Flores E
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 15
- Impact of initial biofilm growth on the anode impedance of microbial fuel cells.
- Authors: Ramasamy RP, Ren Z, Mench MM, Regan JM
- Issue date: 2008 Sep 1
- Understanding long-term changes in microbial fuel cell performance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
- Authors: Borole AP, Aaron D, Hamilton CY, Tsouris C
- Issue date: 2010 Apr 1
- Electrochemical characterization of microbial bioanodes formed on a collector/electrode system in a highly saline electrolyte.
- Authors: Rousseau R, Rimboud M, Délia ML, Bergel A, Basséguy R
- Issue date: 2015 Dec
- Impact of Ohmic Resistance on Measured Electrode Potentials and Maximum Power Production in Microbial Fuel Cells.
- Authors: Logan BE, Zikmund E, Yang W, Rossi R, Kim KY, Saikaly PE, Zhang F
- Issue date: 2018 Aug 7