Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/598671
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe four known diiodine complexes have distinct geometries. These turn out, as we demonstrate by a bonding analysis, to be a direct consequence of diiodine acting as an acceptor in one set, the van Koten complexes, and as a donor in the Cotton, Dikarev, and Petrukhina extended structure. The primary analytical tool utilized is perturbation theory within the natural bond orbital (NBO) framework, supported by an energy decomposition analysis. The study begins by delineating the difference between canonical molecular orbitals (MOs) and NBOs. When iodine acts as an acceptor, bonding collinearly in the axial position of a square-planar d8 Pt(II) complex, the dominant contributor to the bonding is a σ*(I-I) orbital as the acceptor orbital, while a mainly dz 2 orbital centered on the metal center is the corresponding donor. That this kind of bonding is characteristic of axial bonding in d8 complexes was supported by model calculations with incoming donors and acceptors, NH3 and BH3. In contrast, the distinct "bent" coordination of the I2 bound at the axial position of the [Rh2(O2CCF3)4] paddle-wheel complex is associated with a dominant donation from a p-type lone pair localized on one of two iodine atoms, the σ*(Rh-Rh) antibonding orbital of the metal complex acting as an acceptor orbital. We check the donor capabilities of I2 in some hypothetical complexes with Lewis acids, H+, AlCl3, B(CF3)3. Also, we look at the weakly bound donor-acceptor couple [(I2)·(I2)]. We explore the reasons for the paucity of I2 complexes and propose candidates for synthesis. © 2013 American Chemical Society.
CitationRogachev AY, Hoffmann R (2013) Iodine (I 2 ) as a Janus-Faced Ligand in Organometallics . Journal of the American Chemical Society 135: 3262–3275. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja312584u.
SponsorsWe are grateful to G. van Koten for bringing to our attention a number of important papers and useful comments, and to P. Wolzanski for steering us to the work of A. Heyduk. Our work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Research Grant CHE-0910623. Computational facilities provided by KAUST (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) Supercomputing Laboratory are gratefully acknowledged.
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)
CollectionsPublications Acknowledging KAUST Support
- SO₂--yet another two-faced ligand.
- Authors: Li J, Rogachev AY
- Issue date: 2015 Jan 21
- Borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2: isoelectronic homologues of carbones CL2.
- Authors: Celik MA, Sure R, Klein S, Kinjo R, Bertrand G, Frenking G
- Issue date: 2012 Apr 27
- Electronic Structure of [Pt(2)(&mgr;-O(2)CCH(3))(4)(H(2)O)(2)](2+) Using the Quasi-Relativistic Xalpha-SW Method: Analysis of Metal-Metal Bonding, Assignment of Electronic Spectra, and Comparison with Rh(2)(&mgr;-O(2)CCH(3))(4)(H(2)O)(2).
- Authors: Stranger R, Medley GA, McGrady JE, Garrett JM, Appleton TG
- Issue date: 1996 Apr 10
- Orbital symmetry as a tool for understanding the bonding in Krossing's cation.
- Authors: Deubel DV
- Issue date: 2002 Oct 16
- Sigma-donor and pi-acceptor properties of phosphorus ligands: an insight from the natural orbitals for chemical valence.
- Authors: Mitoraj MP, Michalak A
- Issue date: 2010 Jan 18