Hydrogen Production by Geobacter Species and a Mixed Consortium in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell
KAUST Grant NumberKUS-I1-003-13
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/598534
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractA hydrogen utilizing exoelectrogenic bacterium (Geobacter sulfurreducens) was compared to both a nonhydrogen oxidizer (Geobacter metallireducens) and a mixed consortium in order to compare the hydrogen production rates and hydrogen recoveries of pure and mixed cultures in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). At an applied voltage of 0.7 V, both G. sulfurreducens and the mixed culture generated similar current densities (ca. 160 A/m3), resulting in hydrogen production rates of ca. 1.9 m3 H2/m 3/day, whereas G. metallireducens exhibited lower current densities and production rates of 110 ± 7 A/m3 and 1.3 ± 0.1 m3 H2/m3/day, respectively. Before methane was detected in the mixed-culture MEC, the mixed consortium achieved the highest overall energy recovery (relative to both electricity and substrate energy inputs) of 82% ± 8% compared to G. sulfurreducens (77% ± 2%) and G. metallireducens (78% ± 5%), due to the higher coulombic efficiency of the mixed consortium. At an applied voltage of 0.4 V, methane production increased in the mixed-culture MEC and, as a result, the hydrogen recovery decreased and the overall energy recovery dropped to 38% ± 16% compared to 80% ± 5% for G. sulfurreducens and 76% ± 0% for G. metallireducens. Internal hydrogen recycling was confirmed since the mixed culture generated a stable current density of 31 ± 0 A/m3 when fed hydrogen gas, whereas G. sulfurreducens exhibited a steady decrease in current production. Community analysis suggested that G. sulfurreducens was predominant in the mixed-culture MEC (72% of clones) despite its relative absence in the mixed-culture inoculum obtained from a microbial fuel cell reactor (2% of clones). These results demonstrate that Geobacter species are capable of obtaining similar hydrogen production rates and energy recoveries as mixed cultures in an MEC and that high coulombic efficiencies in mixed culture MECs can be attributed in part to the recycling of hydrogen into current. Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
CitationCall DF, Wagner RC, Logan BE (2009) Hydrogen Production by Geobacter Species and a Mixed Consortium in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 7579–7587. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.01760-09.
SponsorsWe thank D. W. Jones for help with the analytical measurements;M. L. Hazen for assistance with the SEM imaging; and the Penn StateGenomics Core Facility, University Park, PA, for DNA sequencing.This research was funded by the American Society of EngineeringEducation National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship,the National Science Foundation Graduate Research FellowshipProgram, a National Water Research Institute Ronald B. LinskyFellowship, and award KUS-I1-003-13 from King Abdullah Universityof Science and Technology.
PublisherAmerican Society for Microbiology
CollectionsPublications Acknowledging KAUST Support
- Electricity-assisted biological hydrogen production from acetate by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
- Authors: Geelhoed JS, Stams AJ
- Issue date: 2011 Jan 15
- Conjugated oligoelectrolyte represses hydrogen oxidation by Geobacter sulfurreducens in microbial electrolysis cells.
- Authors: Liu J, Hou H, Chen X, Bazan GC, Kashima H, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2015 Dec
- Anode microbial communities produced by changing from microbial fuel cell to microbial electrolysis cell operation using two different wastewaters.
- Authors: Kiely PD, Cusick R, Call DF, Selembo PA, Regan JM, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2011 Jan
- A method for high throughput bioelectrochemical research based on small scale microbial electrolysis cells.
- Authors: Call DF, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2011 Jul 15
- Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane.
- Authors: Call D, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2008 May 1