Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells
Type
ArticleKAUST Grant Number
KUS-I1-003-13Date
2013-02Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/598249
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used to treat wastewater and produce hydrogen gas, but low cost cathode catalysts are needed to make this approach economical. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and stainless steel (SS) were evaluated as alternative cathode catalysts to platinum (Pt) in terms of treatment efficiency and energy recovery using actual wastewaters. Two different types of wastewaters were examined, a methanol-rich industrial (IN) wastewater and a food processing (FP) wastewater. The use of the MoS2 catalyst generally resulted in better performance than the SS cathodes for both wastewaters, although the use of the Pt catalyst provided the best performance in terms of biogas production, current density, and TCOD removal. Overall, the wastewater composition was more of a factor than catalyst type for accomplishing overall treatment. The IN wastewater had higher biogas production rates (0.8-1.8 m3/m3-d), and COD removal rates (1.8-2.8 kg-COD/m3-d) than the FP wastewater. The overall energy recoveries were positive for the IN wastewater (3.1-3.8 kWh/kg-COD removed), while the FP wastewater required a net energy input of -0.7 - 1.2 kWh/kg-COD using MoS 2 or Pt cathodes, and -3.1 kWh/kg-COD with SS. These results suggest that MoS2 is the most suitable alternative to Pt as a cathode catalyst for wastewater treatment using MECs, but that net energy recovery will be highly dependent on the specific wastewater. © 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Citation
Tenca A, Cusick RD, Schievano A, Oberti R, Logan BE (2013) Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38: 1859–1865. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.103.Sponsors
The authors thank Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for providing wastewater samples. This research was supported by Award KUS-I1-003-13 from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).Publisher
Elsevier BVae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.103