Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollier, Bret A.
dc.contributor.authorSkow, Kevin L.
dc.contributor.authorKremer, Shelly R.
dc.contributor.authorMason, Corey D.
dc.contributor.authorSnelgrove, Robert T.
dc.contributor.authorCalhoun, Kirby W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-25T13:10:41Z
dc.date.available2016-02-25T13:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-25
dc.identifier.citationCollier BA, Skow KL, Kremer SR, Mason CD, Snelgrove RT, et al. (2012) Distribution and derivation of white-winged dove harvests in Texas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36: 304–312. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.136.
dc.identifier.issn1938-5463
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wsb.136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/597999
dc.description.abstractBand recoveries provide requisite data for evaluating the spatial distribution of harvest relative to the distribution of breeding stocks for a wide variety of migratory species. We used direct and indirect band-recovery data to evaluate the distribution and derivation of harvest of white-winged doves (Zenaida asiatica) banded before hunting season in 3 distinct strata in Texas, USA, during 2007-2010. We banded 60,742 white-winged doves during 2007-2010, and based on 2,458 harvest recoveries, the majority (>95%) of white-winged dove harvest occurred during the first 2 months of the hunting season (Sep-Oct). Juvenile white-winged doves represented a greater percentage of the direct recoveries than adults across all strata (north = 80%, central = 69%, south = 82%) and the majority of direct band recoveries (north = 75%, central = 90%, south = 78%) occurred within the original banding strata. Age-specific weighting factors and harvest derivation indicated that both juvenile and adult harvest were highest within the strata of original banding. Harvest distribution data corrected for band-reporting rates indicated high fidelity of white-winged doves to specific geographic strata, with little interplay between strata. Our results suggest that population vital-rate estimates for survival and harvest for use in future Adaptive Harvest Management should focus on stock-specific levels. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for our work was provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Migratory Game Bird Stamp and the Institute of Renewable Natural Resources at Texas A&M University. We gratefully acknowledge L. Reitz and M. Frisbie with Texas Parks and Wildlife for managing daily banding and survey operations over the course of our research. In addition, we appreciate the considerable support from Texas Parks and Wildlife staff for their tireless efforts banding white-winged doves across Texas. B. A. Collier acknowledges partial support for his work from Award no. KUS-C1-016-04 made by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We appreciate comments on a draft of this manuscript from D. L. Otis.
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectBand-recovery
dc.subjectFidelity
dc.subjectHarvest derivation
dc.subjectMigration
dc.subjectSpatial distribution
dc.subjectTexas
dc.subjectWhite-winged dove
dc.subjectZenaida asiatica
dc.titleDistribution and derivation of white-winged dove harvests in Texas
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalWildlife Society Bulletin
dc.contributor.institutionTexas A and M University, College Station, United States
dc.contributor.institutionTexas Department of Parks and Wildlife, Austin, United States
kaust.grant.numberKUS-C1-016-04
dc.date.published-online2012-04-25
dc.date.published-print2012-06


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record