• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Office of Sponsored Research (OSR)
    • KAUST Funded Research
    • Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Office of Sponsored Research (OSR)
    • KAUST Funded Research
    • Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of KAUSTCommunitiesIssue DateSubmit DateThis CollectionIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    Login

    Quick Links

    Open Access PolicyORCID LibguideTheses and Dissertations LibguideSubmit an Item

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    COMPARISON OF EIGENMODE-BASED AND RANDOM FIELD-BASED IMPERFECTION MODELING FOR THE STOCHASTIC BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF I-SECTION BEAM–COLUMNS

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Type
    Article
    Authors
    STAVREV, A.
    STEFANOV, D.
    SCHILLINGER, D.
    RANK, E.
    KAUST Grant Number
    UK-c0020
    Date
    2013-04-04
    Online Publication Date
    2013-04-04
    Print Publication Date
    2013-03
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/10754/597812
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The uncertainty of geometric imperfections in a series of nominally equal I-beams leads to a variability of corresponding buckling loads. Its analysis requires a stochastic imperfection model, which can be derived either by the simple variation of the critical eigenmode with a scalar random variable, or with the help of the more advanced theory of random fields. The present paper first provides a concise review of the two different modeling approaches, covering theoretical background, assumptions and calibration, and illustrates their integration into commercial finite element software to conduct stochastic buckling analyses with the Monte-Carlo method. The stochastic buckling behavior of an example beam is then simulated with both stochastic models, calibrated from corresponding imperfection measurements. The simulation results show that for different load cases, the response statistics of the buckling load obtained with the eigenmode-based and the random field-based models agree very well. A comparison of our simulation results with corresponding Eurocode 3 limit loads indicates that the design standard is very conservative for compression dominated load cases. © 2013 World Scientific Publishing Company.
    Citation
    STAVREV A, STEFANOV D, SCHILLINGER D, RANK E (2013) COMPARISON OF EIGENMODE-BASED AND RANDOM FIELD-BASED IMPERFECTION MODELING FOR THE STOCHASTIC BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF I-SECTION BEAM–COLUMNS. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 13: 1350021. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219455413500211.
    Sponsors
    This publication is based on work supported by Award No. UK-c0020, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). Furthermore, the authors acknowledge support from the Munich Center of Advanced Computing (MAC) and the International Graduate School of Science and Engineering (IGSSE) of the Technische Universitt Mnchen. Extensive research reports related to buckling experiments in I-sections have been kindly provided by Prof. Kim Rasmussen from the University of Sydney and Dr. Andreas Lechner from the Technical University of Graz. Their assistance is also gratefully acknowledged.
    Publisher
    World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
    Journal
    International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
    DOI
    10.1142/S0219455413500211
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1142/S0219455413500211
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | KAUST University Library
    Open Repository is a service hosted by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items. For anonymous users the allowed maximum amount is 50 search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.