Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis.
KAUST Grant NumberKUS-I1-003-13
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/596838
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIn methanogenic microbial electrolysis cells (MMCs), CO2 is reduced to methane using a methanogenic biofilm on the cathode by either direct electron transfer or evolved hydrogen. To optimize methane generation, we examined several cathode materials: plain graphite blocks, graphite blocks coated with carbon black or carbon black containing metals (platinum, stainless steel or nickel) or insoluble minerals (ferrihydrite, magnetite, iron sulfide, or molybdenum disulfide), and carbon fiber brushes. Assuming a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen (abiotic):methane (biotic) of 4:1, methane production with platinum could be explained solely by hydrogen production. For most other materials, however, abiotic hydrogen production rates were insufficient to explain methane production. At -600 mV, platinum on carbon black had the highest abiotic hydrogen gas formation rate (1600 ± 200 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the highest biotic methane production rate (250 ± 90 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). At -550 mV, plain graphite (76 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) performed similarly to platinum (73 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). Coulombic recoveries, based on the measured current and evolved gas, were initially greater than 100% for all materials except platinum, suggesting that cathodic corrosion also contributed to electromethanogenic gas production.
CitationSiegert M, Yates MD, Call DF, Zhu X, Spormann A, et al. (2014) Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2: 910–917. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sc400520x.
SponsorsWe are indebted to John Cantolina of the Materials Science Center at Penn State University for help with ESEM and Hiroyuki Kashima and Yongtae Alm for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Global Climate and Energy Program (GCEP) and by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST, award KUS-I1-003-13).
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)
PubMed Central IDPMC3982937
CollectionsPublications Acknowledging KAUST Support
- Methane production in microbial reverse-electrodialysis methanogenesis cells (MRMCs) using thermolytic solutions.
- Authors: Luo X, Zhang F, Liu J, Zhang X, Huang X, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2014
- Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis.
- Authors: Cheng S, Xing D, Call DF, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2009 May 15
- A comprehensive comparison of five different carbon-based cathode materials in CO<sub>2</sub> electromethanogenesis: Long-term performance, cell-electrode contact behaviors and extracellular electron transfer pathways.
- Authors: Zhen G, Zheng S, Lu X, Zhu X, Mei J, Kobayashi T, Xu K, Li YY, Zhao Y
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells.
- Authors: Call DF, Merrill MD, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2009 Mar 15
- The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells.
- Authors: Siegert M, Li XF, Yates MD, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2014