Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Susana
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCúrdia, João
dc.contributor.authorCancela da Fonseca, Luís
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Miguel N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T14:44:04Z
dc.date.available2016-01-19T14:44:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationCarvalho S, Moura A, Cúrdia J, Cancela da Fonseca L, Santos MN (2013) How complementary are epibenthic assemblages in artificial and nearby natural rocky reefs? Marine Environmental Research 92: 170–177. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.013.
dc.identifier.issn0141-1136
dc.identifier.pmid24135220
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/594237
dc.description.abstractThe present study analyses the composition, structure and trophic function of epibenthic assemblages in two artificial reefs (ARs) 16 years after deployment and in nearby natural reefs (NRs), aiming at providing insights on the complementarity between both habitats. Current findings suggest that after 16 years the ARs (concrete blocks), located in southern Portugal, do not act as surrogates for NRs, as epibenthic assemblages differed between reef types in composition, structure and trophic function. NRs showed higher diversity and complementarity (i.e. beta-diversity) than ARs, evidencing higher redundancy. Higher heterogeneity within NRs was also evidenced by the multi-dimensional scaling analysis based on abundance, biomass and trophic composition. NRs presented higher abundance of molluscs and biomass of sponges, resulting in differences in the trophic function: suspension-feeding dominated the NRs, while within ARs there was an ascendency of carnivory. Although not acting as surrogates for NRs and provided that no adverse effects (e.g. establishment of non-native species) were detected, ARs may have a significant contribution for the increase of regional diversity, as evidenced by the highest complementarity levels observed between assemblages in both reefs. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
dc.description.sponsorshipMARE program
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectArtificial habitats
dc.subjectBeta-diversity
dc.subjectCommunity composition
dc.subjectCommunity function
dc.subjectNatural rocky reefs
dc.subjectNE Atlantic Ocean
dc.titleHow complementary are epibenthic assemblages in artificial and nearby natural rocky reefs?
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentRed Sea Research Center (RSRC)
dc.identifier.journalMarine Environmental Research
dc.contributor.institutionIPMA-Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, Av. 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
dc.contributor.institutionLaboratório Marítimo da Guia/Centro de Oceanografia (FCUL), Av. N. Sra. do Cabo 939, 2750-374 Cascais, Portugal
kaust.personSantos, Miguel Neves Dos


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record