BEACON: automated tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON
KAUST DepartmentComputational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC)
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground Genome annotation is one way of summarizing the existing knowledge about genomic characteristics of an organism. There has been an increased interest during the last several decades in computer-based structural and functional genome annotation. Many methods for this purpose have been developed for eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Our study focuses on comparison of functional annotations of prokaryotic genomes. To the best of our knowledge there is no fully automated system for detailed comparison of functional genome annotations generated by different annotation methods (AMs). Results The presence of many AMs and development of new ones introduce needs to: a/ compare different annotations for a single genome, and b/ generate annotation by combining individual ones. To address these issues we developed an Automated Tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON (BEACON) that benefits both AM developers and annotation analysers. BEACON provides detailed comparison of gene function annotations of prokaryotic genomes obtained by different AMs and generates extended annotations through combination of individual ones. For the illustration of BEACON’s utility, we provide a comparison analysis of multiple different annotations generated for four genomes and show on these examples that the extended annotation can increase the number of genes annotated by putative functions up to 27 %, while the number of genes without any function assignment is reduced. Conclusions We developed BEACON, a fast tool for an automated and a systematic comparison of different annotations of single genomes. The extended annotation assigns putative functions to many genes with unknown functions. BEACON is available under GNU General Public License version 3.0 and is accessible at: http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/BEACON/
CitationBEACON: automated tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON 2015, 16 (1) BMC Genomics
PublisherSpringer Science + Business Media
Is Supplemented ByKalkatawi, M., Intikhab Alam, & Bajic, V. (2015). BEACON: automated tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3616301
- ParsEval: parallel comparison and analysis of gene structure annotations.
- Authors: Standage DS, Brendel VP
- Issue date: 2012 Aug 1
- GASS: genome structural annotation for Eukaryotes based on species similarity.
- Authors: Wang Y, Chen L, Song N, Lei X
- Issue date: 2015 Mar 4
- PANNOTATOR: an automated tool for annotation of pan-genomes.
- Authors: Santos AR, Barbosa E, Fiaux K, Zurita-Turk M, Chaitankar V, Kamapantula B, Abdelzaher A, Ghosh P, Tiwari S, Barve N, Jain N, Barh D, Silva A, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V
- Issue date: 2013 Aug 16
- High-throughput comparison, functional annotation, and metabolic modeling of plant genomes using the PlantSEED resource.
- Authors: Seaver SM, Gerdes S, Frelin O, Lerma-Ortiz C, Bradbury LM, Zallot R, Hasnain G, Niehaus TD, El Yacoubi B, Pasternak S, Olson R, Pusch G, Overbeek R, Stevens R, de Crécy-Lagard V, Ware D, Hanson AD, Henry CS
- Issue date: 2014 Jul 1
- Genome Annotation Transfer Utility (GATU): rapid annotation of viral genomes using a closely related reference genome.
- Authors: Tcherepanov V, Ehlers A, Upton C
- Issue date: 2006 Jun 13
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Overview of errors in the reference sequence and annotation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, and variation amongst its isolatesKöser, Claudio U.; Niemann, Stefan; Summers, David K.; Archer, John A.C. (Elsevier BV, 2012-06)Since its publication in 1998, the genome sequence of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv laboratory strain has acted as the cornerstone for the study of tuberculosis. In this review we address some of the practical aspects that have come to light relating to the use of H37Rv throughout the past decade which are of relevance for the ongoing genomic and laboratory studies of this pathogen. These include errors in the genome reference sequence and its annotation, as well as the recently detected variation amongst isolates of H37Rv from different laboratories. © 2011 Elsevier B.V..
Inferring biological functions of guanylyl cyclases with computational methodsAlquraishi, May Majed; Meier, Stuart Kurt (Humana Press, 2013-09-03)A number of studies have shown that functionally related genes are often co-expressed and that computational based co-expression analysis can be used to accurately identify functional relationships between genes and by inference, their encoded proteins. Here we describe how a computational based co-expression analysis can be used to link the function of a specific gene of interest to a defined cellular response. Using a worked example we demonstrate how this methodology is used to link the function of the Arabidopsis Wall-Associated Kinase-Like 10 gene, which encodes a functional guanylyl cyclase, to host responses to pathogens. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.
App Reviews: Breaking the User and Developer Language BarrierHoon, Leonard; Rodriguez-Garcia, Miguel Angel; Vasa, Rajesh; Valencia-García, Rafael; Schneider, Jean-Guy (Springer Science + Business Media, 2015-10-22)Apple, Google and third party developers offer apps across over twenty categories for various smart mobile devices. Offered exclusively through the App Store and Google Play, each app allows users to review the app and their experience with it. Current literature offers a general statistical picture of these reviews, and a broad overview of the nature of discontent of apps. However, we do not yet have a good framework to classify user reviews against known software quality attributes like performance or usability. In order to close this gap, in this paper, we develop an ontology encompassing software attributes derived from software quality models. This decomposes into approximately five thousand words that users employ to review apps. By identifying a consistent set of vocabulary that users communicate with, we can sanitise large datasets to extract stakeholder actionable information from reviews. The findings offered in this paper assists future app review analysis by bridging end-user communication and software engineering vocabulary.