Numerical comparison of robustness of some reduction methods in rough grids
Type
ArticleKAUST Department
Computational Transport Phenomena LabEarth Science and Engineering Program
Environmental Science and Engineering Program
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
Date
2014-04-09Online Publication Date
2014-04-09Print Publication Date
2014-09Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/564908
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In this article, we present three nonsymmetric mixed hybrid RT 1 2 methods and compare with some recently developed reduction methods which are suitable for the single-phase Darcy flow problem with full anisotropic and highly heterogeneous permeability on general quadrilateral grids. The methods reviewed are multipoint flux approximation (MPFA), multipoint flux mixed finite element method, mixed-finite element with broken RT 1 2 method, MPFA-type mimetic finite difference method, and symmetric mixed-hybrid finite element method. The numerical experiments of these methods on different distorted meshes are compared, as well as their differences in performance of fluxes are discussed. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Citation
Hou, J., Sun, S., & Chen, Z. (2014). Numerical comparison of robustness of some reduction methods in rough grids. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 30(5), 1484–1506. doi:10.1002/num.21873Sponsors
Contract grant sponsor: National Natural Science Foundation of China; contract grant number: No. 11371288Publisher
Wileyae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/num.21873