Yates, Matthew D.
Hatzell, Marta C.
Rao, Hari Ananda
Logan, Bruce E.
KAUST DepartmentWater Desalination and Reuse Research Center (WDRC)
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Environmental Science and Engineering Program
Environmental Biotechnology Research Group
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/563345
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThere is great controversy on how different set anode potentials affect the performance of a bioelectrochemical system (BES). It is often reported that more positive potentials improve acclimation and performance of exoelectrogenic biofilms, and alter microbial community structure, while in other studies relatively more negative potentials were needed to achieve higher current densities. To address this issue, the biomass, electroactivity, and community structure of anodic biofilms were examined over a wide range of set anode potentials (-0.25, -0.09, 0.21, 0.51, and 0.81 V vs a standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells. Maximum currents produced using a wastewater inoculum increased with anode potentials in the range of -0.25 to 0.21 V, but decreased at 0.51 and 0.81 V. The maximum currents were positively correlated with increasing biofilm biomass. Pyrosequencing indicated biofilm communities were all similar and dominated by bacteria most similar to Geobacter sulfurreducens. Differences in anode performance with various set potentials suggest that the exoelectrogenic communities self-regulate their exocellular electron transfer pathways to adapt to different anode potentials. © 2013 American Chemical Society.
SponsorsThis research was supported by Award KUS-I1-003-13 from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). The authors also want to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the original manuscript.
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)
- Resilience, Dynamics, and Interactions within a Model Multispecies Exoelectrogenic-Biofilm Community.
- Authors: Prokhorova A, Sturm-Richter K, Doetsch A, Gescher J
- Issue date: 2017 Mar 15
- The impact of electron donors and anode potentials on the anode-respiring bacteria community.
- Authors: Ying X, Guo K, Chen W, Gu Y, Shen D, Zhou Y, Liang Y, Wang Y, Wang M, Feng H
- Issue date: 2017 Nov
- Community analysis of biofilms on flame-oxidized stainless steel anodes in microbial fuel cells fed with different substrates.
- Authors: Eyiuche NJ, Asakawa S, Yamashita T, Ikeguchi A, Kitamura Y, Yokoyama H
- Issue date: 2017 Jun 29
- Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
- Authors: Commault AS, Lear G, Packer MA, Weld RJ
- Issue date: 2013 Jul
- Controlling the occurrence of power overshoot by adapting microbial fuel cells to high anode potentials.
- Authors: Zhu X, Tokash JC, Hong Y, Logan BE
- Issue date: 2013 Apr