• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of KAUSTCommunitiesIssue DateSubmit DateThis CollectionIssue DateSubmit Date

    My Account

    Login

    Quick Links

    Open Access PolicyORCID LibguideTheses and Dissertations LibguideSubmit an Item

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Type
    Article
    Authors
    Oliva, Romina M.
    Vangone, Anna
    Cavallo, Luigi cc
    KAUST Department
    Chemical Science Program
    KAUST Catalysis Center (KCC)
    Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
    Date
    2013-06-17
    Online Publication Date
    2013-06-17
    Print Publication Date
    2013-09
    Permanent link to this record
    http://hdl.handle.net/10754/562813
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Molecular docking is the method of choice for investigating the molecular basis of recognition in a large number of functional protein complexes. However, correctly scoring the obtained docking solutions (decoys) to rank native-like (NL) conformations in the top positions is still an open problem. Herein we present CONSRANK, a simple and effective tool to rank multiple docking solutions, which relies on the conservation of inter-residue contacts in the analyzed decoys ensemble. First it calculates a conservation rate for each inter-residue contact, then it ranks decoys according to their ability to match the more frequently observed contacts. We applied CONSRANK to 102 targets from three different benchmarks, RosettaDock, DOCKGROUND, and Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI). The method performs consistently well, both in terms of NL solutions ranked in the top positions and of values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Its ideal application is to solutions coming from different docking programs and procedures, as in the case of CAPRI targets. For all the analyzed CAPRI targets where a comparison is feasible, CONSRANK outperforms the CAPRI scorers. The fraction of NL solutions in the top ten positions in the RosettaDock, DOCKGROUND, and CAPRI benchmarks is enriched on average by a factor of 3.0, 1.9, and 9.9, respectively. Interestingly, CONSRANK is also able to specifically single out the high/medium quality (HMQ) solutions from the docking decoys ensemble: it ranks 46.2 and 70.8% of the total HMQ solutions available for the RosettaDock and CAPRI targets, respectively, within the top 20 positions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Citation
    Oliva, R., Vangone, A., & Cavallo, L. (2013). Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 81(9), 1571–1584. doi:10.1002/prot.24314
    Sponsors
    Funding: RO has been supported by the Italian MIUR (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca; Grant PRIN2008). RO thanks Dr. Angelo Ciaramella and Dr. Antonino Staiano for helpful discussions.
    Publisher
    Wiley
    Journal
    Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
    DOI
    10.1002/prot.24314
    PubMed ID
    23609916
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1002/prot.24314
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Articles; Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division; Chemical Science Program; KAUST Catalysis Center (KCC)

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | KAUST University Library
    Open Repository is a service hosted by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items. For anonymous users the allowed maximum amount is 50 search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.