Wide-azimuth angle gathers for anisotropic wave-equation migration
Type
ArticleKAUST Department
Earth Science and Engineering ProgramEnvironmental Science and Engineering Program
Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division
Seismic Wave Analysis Group
Date
2012-10-15Online Publication Date
2012-10-15Print Publication Date
2013-01Permanent link to this record
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/562365
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Extended common-image-point gathers (CIP) constructed by wide-azimuth TI wave-equation migration contain all the necessary information for angle decomposition as a function of the reflection and azimuth angles at selected locations in the subsurface. The aperture and azimuth angles are derived from the extended images using analytic relations between the space- and time-lag extensions using information which is already available at the time of migration, i.e. the anisotropic model parameters. CIPs are cheap to compute because they can be distributed in the image at the most relevant positions, as indicated by the geologic structure. If the reflector dip is known at the CIP locations, then the computational cost can be reduced by evaluating only two components of the space-lag vector. The transformation from extended images to angle gathers is a planar Radon transform which depends on the local medium parameters. This transformation allows us to separate all illumination directions for a given experiment, or between different experiments. We do not need to decompose the reconstructed wavefields or to choose the most energetic directions for decomposition. Applications of the method include illumination studies in complex areas where ray-based methods fail, and assuming that the subsurface illumination is sufficiently dense, the study of amplitude variation with aperture and azimuth angles. © 2012 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.Citation
Sava, P., & Alkhalifah, T. (2012). Wide-azimuth angle gathers for anisotropic wave-equation migration. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(1), 75–91. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01024.xPublisher
WileyJournal
Geophysical Prospectingae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01024.x