The detection of the methylated Wif-1 gene is more accurate than a fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening
Article - Full Text
Supplemental File 1
Microsoft Word 2007
Supplemental File 2
Microsoft Word 2007
Supplemental File 3
Supplemental File 4
KAUST DepartmentBioscience Core Lab
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/334640
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: The clinical benefit of guaiac fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) is now well established for colorectal cancer screening. Growing evidence has demonstrated that epigenetic modifications and fecal microbiota changes, also known as dysbiosis, are associated with CRC pathogenesis and might be used as surrogate markers of CRC. Patients and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study that included all consecutive subjects that were referred (from 2003 to 2007) for screening colonoscopies. Prior to colonoscopy, effluents (fresh stools, sera-S and urine-U) were harvested and FOBTs performed. Methylation levels were measured in stools, S and U for 3 genes (Wif1, ALX-4, and Vimentin) selected from a panel of 63 genes; Kras mutations and seven dominant and subdominant bacterial populations in stools were quantified. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square, and discrimination was determined by calculating the C-statistic (Area Under Curve) and Net Reclassification Improvement index. Results: There were 247 individuals (mean age 60.8±12.4 years, 52% of males) in the study group, and 90 (36%) of these individuals were patients with advanced polyps or invasive adenocarcinomas. A multivariate model adjusted for age and FOBT led to a C-statistic of 0.83 [0.77-0.88]. After supplementary sequential (one-by-one) adjustment, Wif-1 methylation (S or U) and fecal microbiota dysbiosis led to increases of the C-statistic to 0.90 [0.84-0.94] (p = 0.02) and 0.81 [0.74-0.86] (p = 0.49), respectively. When adjusted jointly for FOBT and Wif-1 methylation or fecal microbiota dysbiosis, the increase of the C-statistic was even more significant (0.91 and 0.85, p<0.001 and p = 0.10, respectively). Conclusion: The detection of methylated Wif-1 in either S or U has a higher performance accuracy compared to guaiac FOBT for advanced colorectal neoplasia screening. Conversely, fecal microbiota dysbiosis detection was not more accurate. Blood and urine testing could be used in those individuals reluctant to undergo stool testing. © 2014 Amiot et al.
CitationAmiot A, Mansour H, Baumgaertner I, Delchier J-C, Tournigand C, et al. (2014) The Detection of the Methylated Wif-1 Gene Is More Accurate than a Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. PLoS ONE 9: e99233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099233.
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PubMed Central IDPMC4099003
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Detection of promoter hypermethylation of Wnt antagonist genes in fecal samples for diagnosis of early colorectal cancer.
- Authors: Zhang H, Zhu YQ, Wu YQ, Zhang P, Qi J
- Issue date: 2014 May 28
- Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
- Authors: Medical Advisory Secretariat.
- Issue date: 2009
- Aberrant methylation of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as a promising marker for blood-based diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
- Authors: Roperch JP, Incitti R, Forbin S, Bard F, Mansour H, Mesli F, Baumgaertner I, Brunetti F, Sobhani I
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 1
- [Chemical or immunological tests for the detection of fecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening?].
- Authors: Quintero E
- Issue date: 2009 Oct
- Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.
- Authors: van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, van Oijen MG, Fockens P, van Krieken HH, Verbeek AL, Jansen JB, Dekker E
- Issue date: 2008 Jul