Unraveling plant responses to bacterial pathogens through proteomics
KAUST DepartmentBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division
Online Publication Date2011-11-03
Print Publication Date2011
Permanent link to this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/325464
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPlant pathogenic bacteria cause diseases in important crops and seriously and negatively impact agricultural production. Therefore, an understanding of the mechanisms by which plants resist bacterial infection at the stage of the basal immune response or mount a successful specific R-dependent defense response is crucial since a better understanding of the biochemical and cellular mechanisms underlying these interactions will enable molecular and transgenic approaches to crops with increased biotic resistance. In recent years, proteomics has been used to gain in-depth understanding of many aspects of the host defense against pathogens and has allowed monitoring differences in abundance of proteins as well as posttranscriptional and posttranslational processes, protein activation/inactivation, and turnover. Proteomics also offers a window to study protein trafficking and routes of communication between organelles. Here, we summarize and discuss current progress in proteomics of the basal and specific host defense responses elicited by bacterial pathogens. Copyright 2011 Tamara Zimaro et al.
CitationZimaro T, Gottig N, Garavaglia BS, Gehring C, Ottado J (2011) Unraveling Plant Responses to Bacterial Pathogens through Proteomics. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2011: 1-12. doi:10.1155/2011/354801.
PubMed Central IDPMC3216475
- An Overview of Proteomics Tools for Understanding Plant Defense Against Pathogens.
- Authors: Grandellis C, Vranych CV, Piazza A, Garavaglia BS, Gottig N, Ottado J
- Issue date: 2016
- Omics Approaches for the Engineering of Pathogen Resistant Plants.
- Authors: Gomez-Casati DF, Pagani MA, Busi MV, Bhadauria V
- Issue date: 2016
- RNA Interference: A Natural Immune System of Plants to Counteract Biotic Stressors.
- Authors: Muhammad T, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Liang Y
- Issue date: 2019 Jan 10
- Current Status of Proteomic Studies on Defense Responses in Rice.
- Authors: Chen X, Bhadauria V, Ma B
- Issue date: 2016
- Nonhost resistance against bacterial pathogens: retrospectives and prospects.
- Authors: Senthil-Kumar M, Mysore KS
- Issue date: 2013
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Environmental stress is the major cause of transcriptomic and proteomic changes in GM and non-GM plantsBatista, Rita; Fonseca, Cátia; Planchon, Sébastien; Negrão, Sónia; Renaut, Jenny; Oliveira, M. Margarida (Scientific Reports, Springer Nature, 2017-09-06) [Article]The approval of genetically modified (GM) crops is preceded by years of intensive research to demonstrate safety to humans and environment. We recently showed that in vitro culture stress is the major factor influencing proteomic differences of GM vs. non-GM plants. This made us question the number of generations needed to erase such
Proteome-Wide Chromatin Interactomics to Study Plant Epigenetics.Chen, Yanmei; Liu, Peng (Trends in plant science, Elsevier BV, 2021-05-12) [Article]Over 1000 proteins interact with and regulate plant chromatin, but the functions of most of these proteins are unclear. Advances in quantitative mass spectrometry (MS), interactomic mapping, and machine learning applications for data analysis have enabled proteome-wide investigations of chromatin regulation and in vivo studies of chromatin-bound protein functions and complex formation. Characterizing the protein-centric chromatin interactome would provide clues to how chromatin regulates epigenome landscapes and transcriptional programs related to diverse environmental and developmental cues.
Is there evidence of optimisation for carbon efficiency in plant proteomes?Jankovic, Boris R.; Seoighe, Cathal; Alquraishi, May Majed; Gehring, Christoph A (Plant Biology, Wiley, 2011-07-25) [Article]Flowering plants, angiosperms, can be divided into two major clades, monocots and dicots, and while differences in amino acid composition in different species from the two clades have been reported, a systematic analysis of amino acid content and distribution remains outstanding. Here, we show that monocot and dicot proteins have developed distinct amino acid content. In Arabidopsis thaliana and poplar, as in the ancestral moss Physcomitrella patens, the average mass per amino acid appears to be independent of protein length, while in the monocots rice, maize and sorghum, shorter proteins tend to be made of lighter amino acids. An examination of the elemental content of these proteomes reveals that the difference between monocot and dicot proteins can be largely attributed to their different carbon signatures. In monocots, the shorter proteins, which comprise the majority of all proteins, are made of amino acids with less carbon, while the nitrogen content is unchanged in both monocots and dicots. We hypothesise that this signature could be the result of carbon use and energy optimisation in fast-growing annual Poaceae (grasses). © 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.