The use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells

Handle URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10754/599976
Title:
The use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells
Authors:
Selembo, Priscilla A.; Merrill, Mathew D.; Logan, Bruce E.
Abstract:
Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) are used to produce hydrogen gas from the current generated by bacteria, but low-cost alternatives are needed to typical cathode materials (carbon cloth, platinum and Nafion™). Stainless steel A286 was superior to platinum sheet metal in terms of cathodic hydrogen recovery (61% vs. 47%), overall energy recovery (46% vs. 35%), and maximum volumetric hydrogen production rate (1.5 m3 m-3 day-1 vs. 0.68 m3 m-3 day-1) at an applied voltage of 0.9 V. Nickel 625 was better than other nickel alloys, but it did not perform as well as SS A625. The relative ranking of these materials in MEC tests was in agreement with cyclic voltammetry studies. Performance of the stainless steel and nickel cathodes was further increased, even at a lower applied voltage (0.6 V), by electrodepositing a nickel oxide layer onto the sheet metal (cathodic hydrogen recovery, 52%, overall energy recovery, 48%; maximum volumetric hydrogen production rate, 0.76 m3 m-3 day-1). However, performance of the nickel oxide cathodes decreased over time due to a reduction in mechanical stability of the oxides (based on SEM-EDS analysis). These results demonstrate that non-precious metal cathodes can be used in MECs to achieve hydrogen gas production rates better than those obtained with platinum. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Citation:
Selembo PA, Merrill MD, Logan BE (2009) The use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells. Journal of Power Sources 190: 271–278. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.144.
Publisher:
Elsevier BV
Journal:
Journal of Power Sources
Issue Date:
May-2009
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.144
Type:
Article
ISSN:
0378-7753
Sponsors:
The authors thank S. Cheng, D. Call, E. Lalaurette and D. Jones for assistance with MEC experiments, and J.M. Perez and W.A. Lloyd for their advice and insight. This research was supported in part by the Global Research Partnership (GRP) from KAUST University, the General Electric First-Year Faculty for the Future Fellowship and the Arthur and Elizabeth Rose Memorial Fellowship, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Appears in Collections:
Publications Acknowledging KAUST Support

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorSelembo, Priscilla A.en
dc.contributor.authorMerrill, Mathew D.en
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Bruce E.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-28T06:33:38Zen
dc.date.available2016-02-28T06:33:38Zen
dc.date.issued2009-05en
dc.identifier.citationSelembo PA, Merrill MD, Logan BE (2009) The use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells. Journal of Power Sources 190: 271–278. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.144.en
dc.identifier.issn0378-7753en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.144en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10754/599976en
dc.description.abstractMicrobial electrolysis cells (MECs) are used to produce hydrogen gas from the current generated by bacteria, but low-cost alternatives are needed to typical cathode materials (carbon cloth, platinum and Nafion™). Stainless steel A286 was superior to platinum sheet metal in terms of cathodic hydrogen recovery (61% vs. 47%), overall energy recovery (46% vs. 35%), and maximum volumetric hydrogen production rate (1.5 m3 m-3 day-1 vs. 0.68 m3 m-3 day-1) at an applied voltage of 0.9 V. Nickel 625 was better than other nickel alloys, but it did not perform as well as SS A625. The relative ranking of these materials in MEC tests was in agreement with cyclic voltammetry studies. Performance of the stainless steel and nickel cathodes was further increased, even at a lower applied voltage (0.6 V), by electrodepositing a nickel oxide layer onto the sheet metal (cathodic hydrogen recovery, 52%, overall energy recovery, 48%; maximum volumetric hydrogen production rate, 0.76 m3 m-3 day-1). However, performance of the nickel oxide cathodes decreased over time due to a reduction in mechanical stability of the oxides (based on SEM-EDS analysis). These results demonstrate that non-precious metal cathodes can be used in MECs to achieve hydrogen gas production rates better than those obtained with platinum. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank S. Cheng, D. Call, E. Lalaurette and D. Jones for assistance with MEC experiments, and J.M. Perez and W.A. Lloyd for their advice and insight. This research was supported in part by the Global Research Partnership (GRP) from KAUST University, the General Electric First-Year Faculty for the Future Fellowship and the Arthur and Elizabeth Rose Memorial Fellowship, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.en
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.subjectBEAMRen
dc.subjectElectrohydrogenesisen
dc.subjectHydrogen productionen
dc.subjectMECen
dc.subjectMetal cathodeen
dc.subjectNickelen
dc.subjectStainless steelen
dc.titleThe use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cellsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Power Sourcesen
dc.contributor.institutionPennsylvania State University, State College, United Statesen
All Items in KAUST are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.